Literature DB >> 11048873

Testing shelled corn for aflatoxin, Part III: evaluating the performance of aflatoxin sampling plans.

A S Johansson1, T B Whitaker, F G Giesbrecht, W M Hagler, J H Young.   

Abstract

The effects of changes in sample size and/or sample acceptance level on the performance of aflatoxin sampling plans for shelled corn were investigated. Six sampling plans were evaluated for a range of sample sizes and sample acceptance levels. For a given sample size, decreasing the sample acceptance level decreases the percentage of lots accepted while increasing the percentage of lots rejected at all aflatoxin concentrations, and decreases the average aflatoxin concentration in lots accepted and lots rejected. For a given sample size where the sample acceptance level decreases relative to a fixed regulatory guideline, the number of false positives increases and the number of false negatives decreases. For a given sample size where the sample acceptance level increases relative to a fixed regulatory guideline, the number of false positives decreases and the number of false negatives increases. For a given sample acceptance level, increasing the sample size increases the percentage of lots accepted at concentrations below the regulatory guideline while increasing the percentage of lots rejected at concentrations above the regulatory guideline, and decreases the average aflatoxin concentration in the lots accepted while increasing the average aflatoxin concentration in the rejected lots. For a given sample acceptance level that equals the regulatory guideline, increasing the sample size decreases misclassification of lots, both false positives and false negatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11048873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  7 in total

Review 1.  Detecting mycotoxins in agricultural commodities.

Authors:  Thomas B Whitaker
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  A limited survey of aflatoxin B1 contamination in Indonesian palm kernel cake and copra meal sampled from batches.

Authors:  Deni Pranowo; Ali Agus; Sri Wedhastri; Elisabeth Viktoria Reiter; Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli; Jürgen Zentek
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 3.833

3.  Mycotoxin Analysis of Grain via Dust Sampling: Review, Recent Advances and the Way Forward: The Contribution of the MycoKey Project.

Authors:  Biancamaria Ciasca; Sarah De Saeger; Marthe De Boevre; Mareike Reichel; Michelangelo Pascale; Antonio F Logrieco; Veronica M T Lattanzio
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Evaluation of the Impact of Skewness, Clustering, and Probe Sampling Plan on Aflatoxin Detection in Corn.

Authors:  Xianbin Cheng; Matthew J Stasiewicz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.302

5.  Optimization of the Aflatoxin Monitoring Costs along the Maize Supply Chain.

Authors:  M Focker; H J van der Fels-Klerx; A G J M Oude Lansink
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Validation of sampling methods in bulk feed ingredients for detection of swine viruses.

Authors:  Cassandra Jones; Savannah Stewart; Jason Woodworth; Steve Dritz; Chad Paulk
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.005

7.  Comparison of the efficiency between two sampling plans for aflatoxins analysis in maize.

Authors:  Adriano Olnei Mallmann; Alexandro Marchioro; Maurício Schneider Oliveira; Ricardo Hummes Rauber; Paulo Dilkin; Carlos Augusto Mallmann
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.476

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.