Literature DB >> 12611270

Detecting mycotoxins in agricultural commodities.

Thomas B Whitaker1.   

Abstract

It is difficult to obtain precise and accurate estimates of the true mycotoxin concentration of a bulk lot when using a mycotoxin-sampling plan that measures the concentration in a small portion of the bulk lot. A mycotoxin-sampling plan is defined by a mycotoxin test procedure and a defined accept/reject limit. A mycotoxin test procedure is a complicated process and generally consists of several steps: (a) a sample is taken from the lot, (b) the sample is ground (comminuted) in a mill to reduce particle size, (c) a subsample is removed from the comminuted sample, and (d) the mycotoxin is extracted from the comminuted subsample and quantified. Even when using accepted test procedures, there is variability associated with each step of the mycotoxin test procedure. Because of this variability, the true mycotoxin concentration in the lot cannot be determined with 100% certainty by measuring the mycotoxin concentration in a sample taken from the lot. The variability for each step of the mycotoxin test procedure, as measured by the variance statistic, is shown to increase with mycotoxin concentration. Sampling is usually the largest source of variability associated with the mycotoxin test procedure. Sampling variability is large because a small percentage of kernels are contaminated and the level of contamination on a single seed can be very large. Methods to reduce sampling, sample preparation, and analytical variability are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12611270     DOI: 10.1385/MB:23:1:61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1073-6085            Impact factor:   2.695


  15 in total

1.  Mycotoxin method evaluation. An introduction.

Authors:  A E Pohland; M W Trucksess
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2001

2.  Testing shelled corn for aflatoxin, Part I: estimation of variance components.

Authors:  A S Johansson; T B Whitaker; W M Hagler; F G Giesbrecht; J H Young; D T Bowman
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.913

3.  Testing shelled corn for aflatoxin, Part III: evaluating the performance of aflatoxin sampling plans.

Authors:  A S Johansson; T B Whitaker; F G Giesbrecht; W M Hagler; J H Young
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.913

4.  Variability associated with testing cottonseed for aflatoxin.

Authors:  T B Whitaker; M E Whitten
Journal:  J Am Oil Chem Soc       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.849

5.  Variability associated with testing shelled corn for fumonisin.

Authors:  T B Whitaker; M W Trucksess; A S Johansson; F G Giesbrecht; W M Hagler; D T Bowman
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.913

6.  Simulation of aflatoxin testing plans for shelled peanuts in the United States and in the export market.

Authors:  T B Whitaker; J W Dickens
Journal:  J Assoc Off Anal Chem       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

7.  Variability of aflatoxin test results.

Authors:  T B Whitaker; J W Dickens; R J Monroe
Journal:  J Am Oil Chem Soc       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.849

8.  Comparison of the observed distribution of aflatoxin in shelled peanuts to the negative binomial distribution.

Authors:  T B Whitaker; J W Dickens; R J Monroe
Journal:  J Am Oil Chem Soc       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.849

9.  Theoretical investigations into the accuracy of sampling shelled peanuts for aflatoxin.

Authors:  T B Whitaker; E H Wiser
Journal:  J Am Oil Chem Soc       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 1.849

10.  Sampling, sample preparation, and analytical variability associated with testing wheat for deoxynivalenol.

Authors:  T B Whitaker; W M Hagler; F G Giesbrecht; A S Johansson
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.913

View more
  7 in total

1.  Usefulness of the analytical control of aflatoxins in feedstuffs for dairy cows for the prevention of aflatoxin M1 in milk.

Authors:  M Rodríguez-Blanco; A J Ramos; M Prim; V Sanchis; S Marín
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  Investigation of the distribution of deoxynivalenol and ochratoxin A contamination within a 26 t truckload of wheat kernels.

Authors:  S Biselli; C Persin; M Syben
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.833

3.  Effects of thiamine on growth, aflatoxin production, and aflr gene expression in A.parasiticus.

Authors:  L Nazemi; P Kordbacheh; R Daei Ghazvini; M Moazeni; M Akbari Dana; S Rezaie
Journal:  Curr Med Mycol       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Occurrence, Toxicity, and Analysis of Major Mycotoxins in Food.

Authors:  Ahmad Alshannaq; Jae-Hyuk Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Inhibitory effect of vitamin C on Aspergillus parasiticus growth and aflatoxin gene expression.

Authors:  Maryam Akbari Dana; Parivash Kordbacheh; Roshanak Daei Ghazvini; Maryam Moazeni; Ladan Nazemi; Sasan Rezaie
Journal:  Curr Med Mycol       Date:  2018-09

Review 6.  Aflatoxins in Uganda: An Encyclopedic Review of the Etiology, Epidemiology, Detection, Quantification, Exposure Assessment, Reduction, and Control.

Authors:  Timothy Omara; Winfred Nassazi; Tom Omute; Aburu Awath; Fortunate Laker; Raymond Kalukusu; Bashir Musau; Brenda Victoria Nakabuye; Sarah Kagoya; George Otim; Eddie Adupa
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-07

7.  Validation of New ELISA Technique for Detection of Aflatoxin B1 Contamination in Food Products versus HPLC and VICAM.

Authors:  Elsayed Hafez; Nourhan M Abd El-Aziz; Amira M G Darwish; Mohamed G Shehata; Amira A Ibrahim; Asmaa M Elframawy; Ahmed N Badr
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.