Literature DB >> 18493753

Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements.

Rachel Coats1, Geoffrey P Bingham, Mark Mon-Williams.   

Abstract

Feedback is a central feature of neural systems and of crucial importance to human behaviour as shown in goal directed actions such as reaching-to-grasp. One important source of feedback in reach-to-grasp behaviour arises from the haptic information obtained after grasping an object. We manipulated the felt distance and/or size of a visually constant object to explore the role of haptic information in the calibration of reaching and grasping. Crucially, our design explored post-adaptation effects rather than the previously documented role of haptic information in movement organisation. A post-adaptation reach-to-grasp task showed: (1) distorted haptic feedback caused recalibration; (2) reach distance and grasp size could be calibrated separately but, if calibrated simultaneously, then (3) recalibration was greater when distance and size changed in a consistent (e.g. reaching for a larger object at a greater distance) rather than an inconsistent (e.g. a smaller object at a greater distance) fashion. These interactions reveal the integral nature of reach-to-grasp organization, that is, that reaching and grasping are integrated components of a single action system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493753     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1418-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A simple rule of thumb for elegant prehension.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J R Tresilian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments.

Authors:  G P Bingham; A Bradley; M Bailey; R Vinner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Umberto Castiello; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.

Authors:  Geoffrey Bingham; Rachel Coats; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching.

Authors:  G P Bingham; C C Pagano
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing.

Authors:  P Vindras; P Viviani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments.

Authors:  J P Wann; S Rushton; M Mon-Williams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Graphical analysis of prism adaptation, convergence accommodation, and accommodative convergence.

Authors:  C M Schor; V Narayan
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-10
View more
  18 in total

1.  Large perspective changes yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp and it persists after the optic flow has stopped!

Authors:  Young-Lim Lee; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Lack of depth constancy for grasping movements in both virtual and real environments.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The dynamics of sensorimotor calibration in reaching-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Mark A Mon-Williams
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Integration of haptic and visual size cues in perception and action revealed through cross-modal conflict.

Authors:  Charles E Pettypiece; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in immersive haptic-free virtual reality.

Authors:  Madhur Mangalam; Mathew Yarossi; Mariusz P Furmanek; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Coordination of pincer grasp and transport after mechanical perturbation of the index finger.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The visibility of contact points influences grasping movements.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Discovering affordances that determine the spatial structure of reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Online kinematic regulation by visual feedback for grasp versus transport during reach-to-pinch.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Cristian Pasluosta; Zong-Ming Li
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.