Literature DB >> 22411580

The bottle and the glass say to me: "pour!".

Elisa De Stefani1, Alessandro Innocenti, Nicolò Francesco Bernardi, Giovanna Cristina Campione, Maurizio Gentilucci.   

Abstract

The present study aimed at determining whether the observation of two functionally compatible artefacts, that is which potentially concur in achieving a specific function, automatically activates a motor programme of interaction between the two objects. To this purpose, an interference paradigm was used during which an artefact (a bottle filled with orange juice), target of a reaching-grasping and lifting sequence, was presented alone or with a non-target object (distractor) of the same or different semantic category and functionally compatible or not. In experiment 1, the bottle was presented alone or with an artefact (a sphere), or a natural (an apple) distractor. In experiment 2, the bottle was presented with either the apple or a glass (an artefact) filled with orange juice, whereas in experiment 3, either an empty or a filled glass was presented. In the control experiment 4, we compared the kinematics of reaching-grasping and pouring with those of reaching-grasping and lifting. The kinematics of reach, grasp and lift was affected by distractor presentation. However, no difference was observed between two distractors that belonged to different semantic categories. In contrast, the presence of the empty rather filled glass affected the kinematics of the actual grasp. This suggests that an actually functional compatibility between target (the bottle) and distractor (the empty glass) was necessary to activate automatically a programme of interaction (i.e. pouring) between the two artefacts. This programme affected the programme actually executed (i.e. lifting). The results of the present study indicate that, in addition to affordances related to intrinsic object properties, "working affordances" related to a specific use of an artefact with another object can be activated on the basis of functional compatibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22411580     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3047-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  59 in total

1.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects.

Authors:  R Ellis; M Tucker
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-11

2.  Dissociable brain regions process object meaning and object structure during picture naming.

Authors:  C Whatmough; H Chertkow; S Murtha; K Hanratty
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection.

Authors:  M Jane Riddoch; Glyn W Humphreys; Sarah Edwards; Tracy Baker; Katherine Willson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Object familiarity affects finger shaping during grasping of fruit stalks.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  When affordances climb into your mind: advantages of motor simulation in a memory task performed by novice and expert rock climbers.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Laura Barca; Alessandro Lamberti Bocconi; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; U Castiello; M L Corradini; M Scarpa; C Umiltà; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

8.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Angela Sirigu; Myrna F Schwartz; Roberta Klatzky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Kathryn E Lee; James V Haxby; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Why is that Hammer in My Coffee? A Multimodal Imaging Investigation of Contextually Based Tool Understanding.

Authors:  J C Mizelle; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  The spatial alignment effect in near and far space: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Doriana De Marco; Marianna Busiello; Francesca Ferri; Marcello Costantini; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatial frequency tuning of motor responses reveals differential contribution of dorsal and ventral systems to action comprehension.

Authors:  Lucia Amoruso; Alessandra Finisguerra; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Is there any Influence of Variations in Context on Object-Affordance Effects in Schizophrenia? Perception of Property and Goals of Action.

Authors:  Jessica Sevos; Anne Grosselin; Denis Brouillet; Jacques Pellet; Catherine Massoubre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-05

4.  Type of gesture, valence, and gaze modulate the influence of gestures on observer's behaviors.

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Claudio Secchi; Veronica Papa; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Eat me if you can: cognitive mechanisms underlying the distance effect.

Authors:  Astrid F Junghans; Catharine Evers; Denise T D De Ridder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.