Literature DB >> 16680429

Intact automatic avoidance of obstacles in patients with visual form agnosia.

Nichola J Rice1, Robert D McIntosh, Igor Schindler, Mark Mon-Williams, Jean-François Démonet, A David Milner.   

Abstract

In everyday life our reaching behaviour has to be guided not only by the location and properties of the target object, but also by the presence of potential obstacles in the workspace. Recent evidence from neglect and optic ataxia patients has suggested that this automatic obstacle avoidance is mediated by the dorsal, rather than the ventral, stream of visual processing. We tested this idea in two studies involving patients with visual form agnosia resulting from bilateral ventral-stream damage. In the first study, we asked patient DF to reach out and pick up a target object in the presence of obstacles placed at varying distances to the left or right of the target. We found that both DF and controls shifted their trajectories away from the potential obstacles and adjusted their grip aperture in such a way as to minimize risk of collision. In a second study, we asked DF and a second patient, SB, to either reach between, or to bisect the space between, two cylinders presented at varying locations. We found that both patients adjusted their reach trajectories to account for shifts in cylinder location in the reaching task, despite showing significantly worse performance than control subjects when asked to make a bisection judgement. Taken together, these data indicate that automatic obstacle avoidance behaviour is spared in our patients with visual form agnosia. We attribute their ability to the functional intactness of the dorsal stream of visual processing, and argue that the ventral stream plays no important role in automatic obstacle avoidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16680429     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0435-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences.

Authors:  J R Crawford; Paul H Garthwaite
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: evidence from optic ataxia.

Authors:  Igor Schindler; Nichola J Rice; Robert D McIntosh; Yves Rossetti; Alain Vighetto; A David Milner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A locus in human extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; R P Woods; M Iacoboni; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Visual form agnosia. A specific defect in visual discrimination.

Authors:  D F Benson; J P Greenberg
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1969-01

6.  A disorder of lightness discrimination in a case of visual form agnosia.

Authors:  A D Milner; C A Heywood
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Reaching between obstacles in spatial neglect and visual extinction.

Authors:  A David Milner; Robert D McIntosh
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Avoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness.

Authors:  R D McIntosh; K I McClements; I Schindler; T P Cassidy; D Birchall; A D Milner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area.

Authors:  Jennifer K E Steeves; Jody C Culham; Bradley C Duchaine; Cristiana Cavina Pratesi; Kenneth F Valyear; Igor Schindler; G Keith Humphrey; A David Milner; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  18 in total

1.  Why does an obstacle just below the digits' paths not influence a grasping movement while an obstacle to the side of their paths does?

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional MRI in the assessment of cortical activation during gait-related imaginary tasks.

Authors:  JiunJie Wang; YauYau Wai; YiHsin Weng; KoonKwan Ng; Ying-Zu Huang; Leslie Ying; HaoLi Liu; ChiHong Wang
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  "Real-time" obstacle avoidance in the absence of primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Craig S Chapman; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Christopher J Worssam; Lewis C Meade; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Is visual processing in the dorsal stream accessible to consciousness?

Authors:  A D Milner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Stereoscopic vision in the absence of the lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; A David Milner; Andrew J Parker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial orientation of attention and obstacle avoidance following concussion.

Authors:  Robert D Catena; Paul van Donkelaar; Charlene I Halterman; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Outsider interference: no role for motor lateralization in determining the strength of avoidance responses during reaching.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Seeing all the obstacles in your way: the effect of visual feedback and visual feedback schedule on obstacle avoidance while reaching.

Authors:  Craig S Chapman; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.