Literature DB >> 10994232

On the cognitive basis of observational learning: development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors.

Y Blandin1, L Proteau.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that observation of a model practising a motor skill results in the observer developing mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors that are similar to those acquired during physical practice. Results of a first experiment indicated that prior observation of a model permitted participants to estimate their errors as efficiently as those who had physically practised the task. Similarly, results of a second experiment indicated that observation of a model receiving biased knowledge of results during practice resulted in similarly biased reference and error detection/correction mechanisms for the observers and for the models. These results suggest that observation engages one in cognitive processes similar to those occurring during physical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10994232     DOI: 10.1080/713755917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  15 in total

1.  Observation learning versus physical practice leads to different consolidation outcomes in a movement timing task.

Authors:  Maxime Trempe; Maxime Sabourin; Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Absence of after-effects for observers after watching a visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observation learning of a motor task: who and when?

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Starting Block Performance in Sprinters: A Statistical Method for Identifying Discriminative Parameters of the Performance and an Analysis of the Effect of Providing Feedback over a 6-Week Period.

Authors:  Sylvie Fortier; Fabien A Basset; Ginette A Mbourou; Jérôme Favérial; Normand Teasdale
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Serial practice impairs motor skill consolidation.

Authors:  Kristin-Marie Neville; Maxime Trempe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural correlates of the processing of another's mistakes: a possible underpinning for social and observational learning.

Authors:  Matthew S Shane; Michael Stevens; Carla L Harenski; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; David J M Kraemer; Antonia F de C Hamilton; William M Kelley; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The coding and inter-manual transfer of movement sequences.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Attila J Kovacs; Stefan Panzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.