Literature DB >> 31000959

Comparative Morphometry of the Wisconsin Miniature SwineTM Thoracic Spine for Modeling Human Spine in Translational Spinal Cord Injury Research.

Gurwattan Singh Miranpuri1, Dominic T Schomberg1,2, Patricia Stan1, Abhishek Chopra1, Seah Buttar1, Aleksandar Wood2, Alexandra Radzin1, Jennifer J Meudt2, Daniel K Resnick1, Dhanansayan Shanmuganayagam2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Spine and spinal cord pathologies and associated neuropathic pain are among the most complex medical disorders to treat. While rodent models are widely used in spine and spinal cord research and have provided valuable insight into pathophysiological mechanisms, these models offer limited translatability. Thus, studies in rodent models have not led to the development of clinically effective therapies. More recently, swine has become a favored model for spine research because of the high congruency of the species to humans with respect to spine and spinal cord anatomy, vasculature, and immune responses. However, conventional breeds of swine commonly used in these studies present practical and translational hurdles due to their rapid growth toward weights well above those of humans.
METHODS: In the current study, we evaluated the suitability of a human-sized breed of swine developed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Wisconsin Miniature SwineTM (WMSTM), in the context of thoracic spine morphometry for use in research to overcome limitations of conventional swine breeds. The morphometry of thoracic vertebrae (T1-T15) of 5-6 months-old WMS was analyzed and compared to published values of human and conventional swine spines.
RESULTS: The key finding of this study is that WMS spine more closely models the human spine for many of the measured vertebrae parameters, while being similar to conventional swine in respect to the other parameters.
CONCLUSION: WMS provides an improvement over conventional swine for use in translational spinal cord injury studies, particularly long-term ones, because of its slower rate of growth and its maximum growth being limited to human weight and size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Miniature swine; Spinal cord injury; Spine anatomy; Swine models; Thoracic vertebrae

Year:  2018        PMID: 31000959      PMCID: PMC6470333          DOI: 10.1159/000488022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurosci        ISSN: 0972-7531


  27 in total

1.  Benchmarking the ERG valve tip and MRI Interventions Smart Flow neurocatheter convection-enhanced delivery system's performance in a gel model of the brain: employing infusion protocols proposed for gene therapy for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Karl Sillay; Dominic Schomberg; Angelica Hinchman; Lauren Kumbier; Chris Ross; Ken Kubota; Ethan Brodsky; Gurwattan Miranpuri
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Anatomical measurements of porcine lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  R Dath; A D Ebinesan; K M Porter; A W Miles
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  In vitro biomechanical characteristics of the spine: a comparison between human and porcine spinal segments.

Authors:  Iris Busscher; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën; Idsart Kingma; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Albert G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Yi-Fei Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anatomy of deer spine and its comparison to the human spine.

Authors:  N Kumar; S Kukreti; M Ishaque; R Mulholland
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2000-10-01

6.  Comparative anatomy of the porcine and human thoracic spines with reference to thoracoscopic surgical techniques.

Authors:  H Bozkus; N R Crawford; R H Chamberlain; T D Valenzuela; A Espinoza; Z Yüksel; C A Dickman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Mechanisms and treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jan H Vranken
Journal:  Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem       Date:  2009-03

Review 8.  A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology.

Authors:  Alun Ackery; Charles Tator; Andrei Krassioukov
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?

Authors:  A Kettler; L Liakos; B Haegele; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine.

Authors:  Iris Busscher; Joris J W Ploegmakers; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Albert G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  5 in total

1.  Hemodynamic Changes in Response to Hyperacute Spinal Trauma in a Swine Model.

Authors:  Elise D Barras; Chiara E Hampton; Catherine Takawira; Takashi Taguchi; Ali Nourbakhsh; Mandi J Lopez
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.565

2.  Epidural Stimulation Combined with Triple Gene Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury Treatment.

Authors:  Rustem Islamov; Farid Bashirov; Filip Fadeev; Roman Shevchenko; Andrei Izmailov; Vage Markosyan; Mikhail Sokolov; Maksim Kuznetsov; Maria Davleeva; Ravil Garifulin; Ilnur Salafutdinov; Leniz Nurullin; Yuriy Chelyshev; Igor Lavrov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  New Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: Autologous Genetically-Enriched Leucoconcentrate Integrated with Epidural Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Rustem Islamov; Farid Bashirov; Andrei Izmailov; Filip Fadeev; Vage Markosyan; Mikhail Sokolov; Maksim Shmarov; Denis Logunov; Boris Naroditsky; Igor Lavrov
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  Role of Microglia and Astrocytes in Spinal Cord Injury Induced Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Gurwattan S Miranpuri; Parul Bali; Justyn Nguyen; Jason J Kim; Shweta Modgil; Priya Mehra; Seah Buttar; Greta Brown; Noemi Yutuc; Harpreet Singh; Aleksandar Wood; Jagtar Singh; Akshay Anand
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-18

5.  Morphometry of the kangaroo spine and its comparison with human spinal data.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Volker Michael Betz; Annette Kienle
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.610

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.