Literature DB >> 10984711

Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements.

E J Harper1, W Bonfield.   

Abstract

The mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement, used in orthopedic surgery, are very influential in determining successful long-term stability of a prosthesis. A large number of commercial formulations are available, differing in chemical composition and physical properties of both powder and monomer constituents. In this study, the static and dynamic tensile characteristics of a number of the most commonly used bone cements (Palacos R, Simplex P, CMW 1 & 3, Sulfix-60, Zimmer Dough), along with some newer formulations (Endurance, Duracem 3, Osteobondtrade mark and Boneloc), have been investigated under the same testing regimes. Testing was performed in air at room temperature. Significant differences in both static and fatigue properties were found between the various bone cements. Tensile tests revealed that Palacos R, Sulfix-60, and Simplex P had the highest values of ultimate tensile strength, closely followed by CMW 3, while Zimmer Dough cement had the lowest strength. Fatigue testing was performed under stress control, using sinusoidal loading in tension-tension, with an upper stress level of 22MPa. The two outstanding cements when tested in these cyclic conditions were Simplex P and Palacos R, with the highest values of Weibull median cycles to failure. Boneloc bone cement demonstrated the lowest cycles to failure. While the testing regimes were not designed to replicate exact conditions experienced by the bone cement mantle in vivo, there was a correlation between these results and clinical outcome. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10984711     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(200009)53:5<605::aid-jbm22>3.0.co;2-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  17 in total

1.  Bone cements: review of their physiochemical and biochemical properties in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew J Provenzano; Kieran P J Murphy; Lee H Riley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Free volume and mechanical properties of Palacos R bone cement.

Authors:  J Algers; F H J Maurer; M Eldrup; J-S Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Dynamic creep and mechanical characteristics of SmartSet GHV bone cement.

Authors:  C Z Liu; S M Green; N D Watkins; D Baker; A W McCaskie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.

Authors:  Amos Race; Mark A Miller; Michael T Clarke; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  [In vitro elution and mechanical properties of antibiotic-loaded SmartSet HV and Palacos R acrylic bone cements].

Authors:  P M S Simpson; G F Dall; S J Breusch; C Heisel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Static shear strength between polished stem and seven commercial acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhang; Leigh Brown; Liam Blunt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Optimisation of a two-liquid component pre-filled acrylic bone cement system: a design of experiments approach to optimise cement final properties.

Authors:  James Clements; Gavin Walker; Sreekanth Pentlavalli; Nicholas Dunne
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Jonathon M Struemph; Alexander C M Chong; Paul H Wooley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

10.  Biomechanical comparison of tigecycline loaded bone cement with vancomycin and daptomycin loaded bone cements.

Authors:  Sedit Kıvanç Muratlı; Vasfi Karatosun; Bora Uzun; İzge Günal
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.