Literature DB >> 16136337

[In vitro elution and mechanical properties of antibiotic-loaded SmartSet HV and Palacos R acrylic bone cements].

P M S Simpson1, G F Dall, S J Breusch, C Heisel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The continuing emergence of new bone cements with additional antibiotics makes it important to establish which one will provide the most favourable antibiotic elution. An in vitro antibiotic elution and mechanical study was therefore carried out to compare a newer bone cement, SmartSet, with the established Palacos R cement.
METHODS: Samples were prepared with each cement adding 1 g gentamicin, 1 g of vancomycin, or 1 g of gentamicin and vancomycin. The samples were analysed using fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. Mechanical tests were performed to determine whether any significant degradation in the cement strength occurred following addition of the antibiotic.
RESULTS: With regards to gentamicin release Palacos R eluted significantly more antibiotic over the study period than SmartSet (p<0.001). Both cements eluted significantly more gentamicin when two antibiotics were added. With respect to vancomycin release there was no significant difference. Palacos R was significantly stronger than SmartSet in the 4-point bending test when the gentamicin + vancomycin antibiotic groups were compared (p=0.01). Palacos R also demonstrated a higher elastic modulus than SmartSet when the gentamicin and gentamicin + vancomycin groups were compared (p=0.03, p=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Gentamcin shows better release characteristics from Palacos R. Both cements exhibited synergistic release of combined antibiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16136337     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0861-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  14 in total

1.  The in vitro elution characteristics of antibiotic-loaded CMW and Palacos-R bone cements.

Authors:  M J Penner; C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  E J Harper; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-09

3.  The in vitro elution characteristics of vancomycin combined with imipenem-cilastatin in acrylic bone-cements: a pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Daniela Cerretani; Giorgio Giorgi; Paolo Fornara; Luigi Bocchi; Laura Neri; Remo Ceffa; Franco Ghisellini; Merrill A Ritter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Mechanical characteristics of antibiotic-laden bone cement.

Authors:  Michael S Armstrong; Robert F Spencer; James L Cunningham; Sabina Gheduzzi; Anthony W Miles; Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-12

Review 5.  Use of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas N Joseph; Andrew L Chen; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Acrylic bone cements: mechanical and physical properties.

Authors:  Klaus-Dieter Kuehn; Werner Ege; Udo Gopp
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 7.  Acrylic bone cements: composition and properties.

Authors:  Klaus-Dieter Kuehn; Werner Ege; Udo Gopp
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  In vitro elution of gentamicin, amikacin, and ceftiofur from polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite cement.

Authors:  M T Ethell; R A Bennett; M P Brown; K Merritt; J S Davidson; T Tran
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.495

9.  Mechanical properties of bone cements containing large doses of antibiotic powders.

Authors:  E P Lautenschlager; J J Jacobs; G W Marshall; P R Meyer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1976-11

10.  Antibacterial activity of antibiotics in acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  B Picknell; L Mizen; R Sutherland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1977-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Sufficient release of antibiotic by a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Sebastian Vogt; Martin Reinsch; Hubert Büchner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Carriers for the tunable release of therapeutics: etymological classification and examples.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Shreya Ghosh
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 6.648

4.  Gentamicin release from commercially-available gentamicin-loaded PMMA bone cements in a prosthesis-related interfacial gap model and their antibacterial efficacy.

Authors:  Daniëlle Neut; Otto S Kluin; Jonathan Thompson; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Antibiotic-loaded cement in orthopedic surgery: a review.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Giuseppe Massazza; Enrica Verné; Alessandro Massè; Davide Deledda; Sara Ferraris; Marta Miola; Fabrizio Galetto; Maurizio Crova
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-08-07

7.  Microhardness of bi-antibiotic-eluting bone cement scaffolds.

Authors:  Mrinal Musib; Jeremy Jones; Karunesh Chakote; Westley Hayes; Subrata Saha
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2012-10-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.