Literature DB >> 25005558

Optimisation of a two-liquid component pre-filled acrylic bone cement system: a design of experiments approach to optimise cement final properties.

James Clements1, Gavin Walker, Sreekanth Pentlavalli, Nicholas Dunne.   

Abstract

The initial composition of acrylic bone cement along with the mixing and delivery technique used can influence its final properties and therefore its clinical success in vivo. The polymerisation of acrylic bone cement is complex with a number of processes happening simultaneously. Acrylic bone cement mixing and delivery systems have undergone several design changes in their advancement, although the cement constituents themselves have remained unchanged since they were first used. This study was conducted to determine the factors that had the greatest effect on the final properties of acrylic bone cement using a pre-filled bone cement mixing and delivery system. A design of experiments (DoE) approach was used to determine the impact of the factors associated with this mixing and delivery method on the final properties of the cement produced. The DoE illustrated that all factors present within this study had a significant impact on the final properties of the cement. An optimum cement composition was hypothesised and tested. This optimum recipe produced cement with final mechanical and thermal properties within the clinical guidelines and stated by ISO 5833 (International Standard Organisation (ISO), International standard 5833: implants for surgery-acrylic resin cements, 2002), however the low setting times observed would not be clinically viable and could result in complications during the surgical technique. As a result further development would be required to improve the setting time of the cement in order for it to be deemed suitable for use in total joint replacement surgery.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25005558     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5260-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  28 in total

1.  Relative roles of cement molecular weight and mixing method on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: Simplex P versus Osteopal.

Authors:  G Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000

2.  Shrinkage stresses in bone cement.

Authors:  J F Orr; N J Dunne; J C Quinn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Quantitative analysis of the effect of porosity on the fatigue strength of bone cement.

Authors:  David Hoey; David Taylor
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Direct and interactive effects of three variables on properties of PMMA bone cement for vertebral body augmentation.

Authors:  Alejandro López; Erik Unosson; Håkan Engqvist; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  On the setting properties of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  P R Meyer; E P Lautenschlager; B K Moore
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Strength of polymethylmethacrylate increased by vacuum mixing.

Authors:  L Lidgren; H Drar; J Möller
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-10

7.  New aspects of the effect of size and size distribution on the setting parameters and mechanical properties of acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  B Pascual; B Vázquez; M Gurruchaga; I Goñi; M P Ginebra; F J Gil; J A Planell; B Levenfeld; J San Román
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  A characterization of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.

Authors:  S S Haas; G M Brauer; G Dickson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Molecular and macroscopic properties of PMMA bone cement: free-radical generation and temperature change versus mixing ratio.

Authors:  R C Turner; P E Atkins; M A Ackley; J B Park
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1981-05

10.  Influence of two changes in the composition of an acrylic bone cement on its handling, thermal, physical, and mechanical properties.

Authors:  G Lewis; J Xu; S Madigan; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.