Literature DB >> 17619954

Static shear strength between polished stem and seven commercial acrylic bone cements.

Hongyu Zhang1, Leigh Brown, Liam Blunt.   

Abstract

The stem-cement interface is one of the most significant sites in cemented total hip replacement and has long been implicated in failure of the whole joint system. However, shear strength at this interface has rarely been compared across a range of commercially available bone cements. The present study seeks to address this issue by carrying out a comparative study. The results indicated that the static shear strength was more dependent on cement type than cement viscosity and volume. However, both cement type and viscosity were contributory factors on porosity and micropore size in the cement surface. There was no significant difference between Simplex P and Simplex P with Tobramycin. Although the bone cements were all hand mixed in this study, the static shear strength was significantly larger than the values recorded by other researchers, and the porosity and micropore size showed much lower values. Bone cement transfer films were detected on the stem surface, typically about 4-10 mum thick. They were considered to be an important factor contributing to high friction at the stem-cement interface after initial debonding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619954     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3211-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  32 in total

1.  The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.

Authors:  M H Geiger; E M Keating; M A Ritter; J A Ginther; P M Faris; J B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems.

Authors:  J Alfaro-Adrián; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The effects of fluid penetration and interfacial porosity on the fixation of cemented femoral components.

Authors:  K Iesaka; W L Jaffe; C M Jones; F J Kummer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-09

4.  Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.

Authors:  N E Bishop; S Ferguson; S Tepic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-05

5.  Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems.

Authors:  D W Howie; R G Middleton; K Costi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-07

6.  Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; J D Jennings; M L Laurent; W J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fatigue model to characterize cement-metal interface in dynamic shear.

Authors:  P C Chen; J G Pinto; E H Mead; D D D'Lima; C W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement.

Authors:  K A Mann; D C Ayers; F W Werner; R J Nicoletta; M D Fortino
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Antibiotic impregnated bone cement in total hip arthroplasty. An in vivo comparison of the elution properties of tobramycin and vancomycin.

Authors:  W W Brien; E A Salvati; R Klein; B Brause; S Stern
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  On fatigue lifetimes and fatigue crack growth behavior of bone cement.

Authors:  S Ishihara; A J McEvily; T Goshima; K Kanekasu; T Nara
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.