Literature DB >> 9512713

Who checks the checkers? Four validation tools applied to eight atomic resolution structures. EU 3-D Validation Network.

.   

Abstract

Eight protein crystal structures, which have been refined against X-ray diffraction data extending to atomic resolution, 1.2 A or better, were inspected using four different validation tools, PROCHECK, PROVE, SQUID and WHATCHECK. Two general questions were addressed. (1) Do the structures imply changes in "expected" stereochemical properties and are the target values used for restraints in the validation programs and the refinement protocol appropriate? (2) Can errors in models be detected and how reliable are the coordinates after refinement? Preliminary analysis by members of the network led to modifications both to the validation programs and to the refinement protocols. The results of the final analyses are reported here. Apparent discrepancies in cell dimensions were identified. Most stereochemical properties are shown to be more tightly clustered than for lower resolution analyses. In contrast the omega angle has a wider distribution. The validation software is generally available and can be accessed at servers listed at the end of the paper.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9512713     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  18 in total

1.  The Hans Neurath Award lecture of The Protein Society: proteins-- a testament to physics, chemistry, and evolution.

Authors:  J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How planar are planar peptide bonds?

Authors:  Brian W Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  The flexibility in the proline ring couples to the protein backbone.

Authors:  Bosco K Ho; Evangelos A Coutsias; Chaok Seok; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Protein crystallography for non-crystallographers, or how to get the best (but not more) from published macromolecular structures.

Authors:  Alexander Wlodawer; Wladek Minor; Zbigniew Dauter; Mariusz Jaskolski
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  Predicting 13Calpha chemical shifts for validation of protein structures.

Authors:  Jorge A Vila; Myriam E Villegas; Hector A Baldoni; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  CRYBA4, a novel human cataract gene, is also involved in microphthalmia.

Authors:  Gail Billingsley; Sathiyavedu T Santhiya; Andrew D Paterson; Koji Ogata; Shoshana Wodak; S Mohsen Hosseini; Shyam Manohar Manisastry; Perumalsamy Vijayalakshmi; Pudhiya Mundyat Gopinath; Jochen Graw; Elise Héon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Stereochemistry and Validation of Macromolecular Structures.

Authors:  Alexander Wlodawer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

9.  Molecular models of protein targets from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Nelson José Freitas da Silveira; Hugo Brandão Uchôa; José Henrique Pereira; Fernanda Canduri; Luiz Augusto Basso; Mário Sérgio Palma; Diógenes Santiago Santos; Walter Filgueira de Azevedo
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  X-ray crystal structure of GarR-tartronate semialdehyde reductase from Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  J Osipiuk; M Zhou; S Moy; F Collart; A Joachimiak
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.