Literature DB >> 10966628

Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects.

D Whitney1, P Cavanagh.   

Abstract

To perceive the relative positions of objects in the visual field, the visual system must assign locations to each stimulus. This assignment is determined by the object's retinal position, the direction of gaze, eye movements, and the motion of the object itself. Here we show that perceived location is also influenced by motion signals that originate in distant regions of the visual field. When a pair of stationary lines are flashed, straddling but not overlapping a rotating radial grating, the lines appear displaced in a direction consistent with that of the grating's motion, even when the lines are a substantial distance from the grating. The results indicate that motion's influence on position is not restricted to the moving object itself, and that even the positions of stationary objects are coded by mechanisms that receive input from motion-sensitive neurons.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966628     DOI: 10.1038/78878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  48 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Apparent motion cues distort object localisation in egocentric space.

Authors:  Madeleine A Grealy; Yann Coello; Dorothy Heffernan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

Authors:  David Whitney; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.

Authors:  David Whitney; Herbert C Goltz; Christopher G Thomas; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Conscious updating is a rhythmic process.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Rufin Vanrullen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Velocity of motion across the skin influences perception of tactile location.

Authors:  Elizabeth H L Nguyen; Janet L Taylor; Jack Brooks; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.