Literature DB >> 10966094

Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.

M Davison1, W M Baum.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained in sessions composed of seven components, each arranged with a different concurrent-schedule reinforcer ratio. These components occurred in an irregular order with equal frequency, separated by 10-s blackouts. No signals differentiated the different reinforcer ratios. Conditions lasted 50 sessions, and data were collected from the last 35 sessions. In Part 1, the arranged overall reinforcer rate was 2.22 reinforcers per minute. Over conditions, number of reinforcers per component was varied from 4 to 12. In Part 2, the overall reinforcer rate was six per minute, with both 4 and 12 reinforcers per component. Within components, log response-allocation ratios adjusted rapidly as more reinforcers were delivered in the component, and the slope of the choice relation (sensitivity) leveled off at moderately high levels after only about eight reinforcers. When the carryover from previous components was taken into account, the number of reinforcers in the components appeared to have no systematic effect on the speed at which behavior changed after a component started. Consequently, sensitivity values at each reinforcer delivery were superimposable. However, adjustment to changing reinforcer ratios was faster, and reached greater sensitivity values, when overall reinforcer rate was higher. Within a component, each successive reinforcer from the same alternative ("confirming") had a smaller effect than the one before, but single reinforcers from the other alternative ("disconfirming") always had a large effect. Choice in the prior component carried over into the next component, and its effects could be discerned even after five or six reinforcement and nonreinforcement is suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966094      PMCID: PMC1284782          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

Authors:  B Alsop; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.

Authors:  J T Bailey; J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The process of recurrent choice.

Authors:  D G Davis; J E Staddon; A Machado; R G Palmer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  70 in total

1.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.

Authors:  J Landon; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Operant conditioning.

Authors:  J E R Staddon; D T Cerutti
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent-chain performance in transition: effects of terminal-link duration and individual reinforcers.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-08

6.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason; Anthony P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of unequal reinforcer distributions.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Group foraging sensitivity to predictable and unpredictable changes in food distribution: past experience or present circumstances?

Authors:  Kenneth E Bell; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.