C W Andrews1, L Bennett, L X Yu. 1. GlaxoWellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to develop a quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship (QSBR) model for drug discovery and development. METHODS: A database of drugs with human oral bioavailability was assembled in electronic form with structure in SMILES format. Using that database, a stepwise regression procedure was used to link oral bioavailability in humans and substructural fragments in drugs. The regression model was compared with Lipinski's Rule of Five. RESULTS: The human oral bioavailability database contains 591 compounds. A regression model employing 85 descriptors was built to predict the human oral bioavailability of a compound based on its molecular structure. Compared to Lipinski's Rule of Five, the false negative predictions were reduced from 5% to 3% while the false positive predictions decreased from 78% to 53%. A set of substructural descriptors was identified to show which fragments tend to increase/decrease human oral bioavailability. CONCLUSIONS: A novel quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship (QSBR) was developed. Despite a large degree of experimental error, the model was reasonably predictive and stood up to cross-validation. When compared to Lipinski's Rule of Five, the QSBR model was able to reduce false positive predictions.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to develop a quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship (QSBR) model for drug discovery and development. METHODS: A database of drugs with human oral bioavailability was assembled in electronic form with structure in SMILES format. Using that database, a stepwise regression procedure was used to link oral bioavailability in humans and substructural fragments in drugs. The regression model was compared with Lipinski's Rule of Five. RESULTS: The human oral bioavailability database contains 591 compounds. A regression model employing 85 descriptors was built to predict the human oral bioavailability of a compound based on its molecular structure. Compared to Lipinski's Rule of Five, the false negative predictions were reduced from 5% to 3% while the false positive predictions decreased from 78% to 53%. A set of substructural descriptors was identified to show which fragments tend to increase/decrease human oral bioavailability. CONCLUSIONS: A novel quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship (QSBR) was developed. Despite a large degree of experimental error, the model was reasonably predictive and stood up to cross-validation. When compared to Lipinski's Rule of Five, the QSBR model was able to reduce false positive predictions.
Authors: I-Jen Chen; Rajneesh Taneja; Daxu Yin; Paul R Seo; David Young; Alexander D MacKerell; James E Polli Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Sean Ekins; Jeffrey S Johnston; Praveen Bahadduri; Vanessa M D'Souza; Abhijit Ray; Cheng Chang; Peter W Swaan Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 4.200