Literature DB >> 10947256

Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging.

N K Doshi1, Y Shao, R W Silverman, S R Cherry.   

Abstract

Functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) may be a promising technique in conjunction with x-ray mammography for breast cancer patient management. Conventional whole body PET scanners provide metabolic images of breast cancer patients with several shortcomings related to the general-purpose nature of these systems. In whole body scanners, the detectors are typically 20-30 cm away from the breast or axilla, reducing sensitivity, and these scanners have relatively large detector elements (> 4 mm), limiting spatial resolution. Dedicated PET systems for breast imaging aim to overcome these limitations and improve the overall diagnostic quality of the images by bringing the detectors closer to the area to be imaged, thereby improving sensitivity, and by using smaller detector elements to improve the spatial resolution. We have designed and developed a modular PET detector that is composed of a 9x9 array of 3x3x20 mm3 lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) scintillator crystals coupled to an optical fiber taper, which in turn is coupled to a Hamamatsu R5900-C8 position-sensitive photomultiplier tube. These detectors can be tiled together without gaps to construct large area detector arrays to form a dedicated PET breast cancer imaging system. Two complete detector modules have been built and tested. All detector elements are clearly visualized upon flood irradiation of the module. The intrinsic spatial resolution (full-width at half-maximum) was measured to be 2.26 mm (range 1.8-2.6 mm). The average energy resolution was 19.5% (range 17%-24%) at 511 keV. The coincidence time resolution was measured to be 2.4 ns. The detector efficiency for 511 keV gamma rays was 53% using a 350 keV energy threshold. These promising results support the feasibility of developing a high resolution, high sensitivity dedicated PET scanner for breast cancer applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10947256     DOI: 10.1118/1.599019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  15 in total

1.  Physical effects of mechanical design parameters on photon sensitivity and spatial resolution performance of a breast-dedicated PET system.

Authors:  V C Spanoudaki; F W Y Lau; A Vandenbroucke; C S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Improving PET imaging for breast cancer using virtual pinhole PET half-ring insert.

Authors:  Aswin John Mathews; Sergey Komarov; Heyu Wu; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation.

Authors:  Xavier Geets; John A Lee; Anne Bol; Max Lonneux; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Study of the performance of a novel 1 mm resolution dual-panel PET camera design dedicated to breast cancer imaging using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Peter D Olcott; Garry Chinn; Angela M K Foudray; Craig S Levine
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A DOI Detector With Crystal Scatter Identification Capability for High Sensitivity and High Spatial Resolution PET Imaging.

Authors:  Z Gu; D L Prout; R W Silverman; H Herman; A Dooraghi; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.679

Review 8.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quantification of radiotracer uptake with a dedicated breast PET imaging system.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylmana; Mark F Smith; Paul E Kinahan; Stan Majewski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.