Literature DB >> 10931769

The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric.

A Berger1, A Henik.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to a reflexive mechanism mediated by phylogenetically primitive extrageniculate visuomotor pathways, which apparently serves to favor novel spatial locations by inhibiting those recently sampled. We demonstrate an asymmetry between temporal and nasal hemifields in the strategic modulation of IOR by endogenously controlled attention. Exogenous and endogenous precues were manipulated independently on each trial such that precues to initiate endogenous spatial orienting were presented after IOR had been activated by exogenous visual signals. Both types of precues manifested their characteristic effects on reaction time (RT) to detect subsequent targets: facilitation by endogenous precues, and IOR by exogenous precues. Under monocular viewing, an asymmetric interaction between these two mechanisms was observed. While endogenous allocation of attention to the nasal hemifield reduced IOR, no endogenous modulation of IOR was present in the temporal hemifield where the effects of the two types of precues were independent. These observations suggest a framework for understanding the neurobiology of automaticity and control - from an evolutionary perspective.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931769     DOI: 10.1162/089892900562246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; Caroline Decaix; Eric Siéroff; Sylvie Chokron; Bruce Milliken; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reaction times of manual responses to a visual stimulus at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Sara C Steenrod; James W Bisley; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06

6.  FMRI correlates of visuo-spatial reorienting investigated with an attention shifting double-cue paradigm.

Authors:  Elena Natale; Carlo Alberto Marzi; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Thomas Sterling; Robert D Rafal; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Attentional dynamics mediated by subcortical mechanisms.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Space-based but not object-based inhibition of return is impaired in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin; J Vincent Filoteo; David D Song; David P Salmon
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.