Literature DB >> 20081160

Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task.

Shai Gabay1, Avishai Henik.   

Abstract

This research examined the influence of cue temporal predictability on inhibition of return (IOR) in a discrimination task. In exogenous attention experiments, the cue that summons attention is noninformative as to where the target will appear. However, it is predictive as to when it will appear. In previous work, it was demonstrated that temporal predictability does not influence IOR in detection tasks. In this work, it is shown that IOR is influenced by temporal predictability in discrimination tasks. Predictability was manipulated by using three stimulus onset asynchrony distributions: nonaging, aging, and accelerated aging. IOR was found when the cue predicted target appearance and was modulated by temporal information. In the nonaging distribution (in which the cue did not predict target appearance), there was no IOR.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081160     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Volitional covert orienting to a peripheral cue does not suppress cue-induced inhibition of return.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; L Chelazzi; G Tassinari
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Inhibition of return and nonspecific preparation: separable inhibitory control mechanisms in space and time.

Authors:  Sander A Los
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

3.  Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupiáñez; Martha Roberts; Biljana Stevanovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Juan Lupianez; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.

Authors:  Andrea Berger; Avishai Henik; Robert Rafal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

Review 6.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation.

Authors:  Sander A Los; Frank Agter
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

8.  The effects of expectancy on inhibition of return.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-06-27

9.  Reallocation of visual attention.

Authors:  R Egly; D Homa
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11
View more
  12 in total

1.  Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Daniel Barnes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-24

2.  Timing the events of directional cueing.

Authors:  Giovanna Girardi; Gabriella Antonucci; Daniele Nico
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-03

3.  Using Rescorla's truly random control condition to measure truly exogenous covert orienting.

Authors:  Mohammad Habibnezhad; Michael A Lawrence; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

4.  Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects.

Authors:  Alfred Lim; Vivian Eng; Steve M J Janssen; Jason Satel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Endogenous temporal and spatial orienting: Evidence for two distinct attentional mechanisms.

Authors:  Noam Weinbach; Inbal Shofty; Shai Gabay; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

6.  Attentional dynamics mediated by subcortical mechanisms.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Andy Jeesu Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

8.  Exogenous visual orienting is associated with specific neurotransmitter genetic markers: a population-based genetic association study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Lundwall; Dong-Chuan Guo; James L Dannemiller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Changes in Tonic Alertness but Not Voluntary Temporal Preparation Modulate the Attention Elicited by Task-Relevant Gaze and Arrow Cues.

Authors:  Dana A Hayward; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-07

10.  Measuring attention using the Posner cuing paradigm: the role of across and within trial target probabilities.

Authors:  Dana A Hayward; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.