Literature DB >> 10889863

Hereditary breast cancer. Risk assessment of patients with a family history of breast cancer.

E Warner1, R E Heisey, V Goel, J C Carroll, D R McCready.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assist family physicians in stratifying women with a family history of breast cancer as being at low, moderate, or high risk of hereditary breast cancer (HBC). To present guidelines for managing each of these risk groups. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: A MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1976 to December 1997 using key words related to breast cancer risk factors, risk assessment, prevention, and screening. Risk stratification criteria were derived empirically and assessed using retrospective chart review. MAIN
FINDINGS: Although up to 20% of women in the general population have a family history of breast cancer, less than 5% are at high risk for HBC. Certain features in a family history suggest increased risk. Women with none of these features are at low risk for HBC and should have annual clinical breast examinations and mammography at least every 2 years starting at age 50. Women with one or more features of increased risk who do not meet criteria for referral to a familial cancer clinic are at moderate risk for HBC and should begin annual mammography and clinical breast examination at age 40. Women who meet referral criteria are at high risk for HBC and should be counseled regarding referral to a familial cancer clinic for more detailed risk assessment and consideration for genetic testing. All women should be taught proper breast self-examination technique and encouraged but not pressured to practise it monthly for life.
CONCLUSION: A simple algorithm can assist physicians in stratifying women into low, moderate, and high HBC risk groups. Management strategies for each group are given in this article and the two following (Heisey et al page 114 and Carroll et al page 126).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10889863      PMCID: PMC2328077     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  37 in total

1.  The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification.

Authors:  E Warner; G Lockwood; D Tritchler; N F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1992

2.  Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years.

Authors:  M M Roberts; F E Alexander; T J Anderson; U Chetty; P T Donnan; P Forrest; W Hepburn; A Huggins; A E Kirkpatrick; J Lamb
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-02-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The role of hormone replacement therapy in the risk for breast cancer and total mortality in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  T A Sellers; P J Mink; J R Cerhan; W Zheng; K E Anderson; L H Kushi; A R Folsom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Relationship between breast self-examination and death from breast cancer by age groups.

Authors:  M C Costanza; R S Foster
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1984

5.  Low-risk diet for breast cancer in Italy.

Authors:  S Franceschi; C La Vecchia; A Russo; E Negri; A Favero; A Decarli
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: preliminary results from a new program.

Authors:  P L Chart; E Franssen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Self examination of the breast: is it beneficial? Meta-analysis of studies investigating breast self examination and extent of disease in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Hill; V White; D Jolley; K Mapperson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-07-23

8.  The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad).

Authors:  V F Semiglazov; V M Moiseyenko; J L Bavli; N Sh Migmanova; N K Seleznyov; R T Popova; O A Ivanova; A A Orlov; O A Chagunava; N J Barash
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Breast self-examination in relation to the occurrence of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  P A Newcomb; N S Weiss; B E Storer; D Scholes; B E Young; L F Voigt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-02-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  11 in total

1.  Psychosocial issues following a positive result of genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: findings from a focus group and a needs-assessment survey.

Authors:  L S Di Prospero; M Seminsky; J Honeyford; B Doan; E Franssen; W Meschino; P Chart; E Warner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Falling through the cracks. Women's experiences of ineligibility for genetic testing for risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Bottorff; L G Balneaves; J Buxton; P A Ratner; M McCullum; K Chalmers; T Hack
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Adherence to breast and ovarian cancer screening recommendations for female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Michael A Campitelli; Anna M Chiarelli; Lucia Mirea; Lindsay Stewart; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Influence of perceived breast cancer risk on screening behaviors of female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Li Rita Zhang; Anna M Chiarelli; Gord Glendon; Lucia Mirea; Sarah Edwards; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  Familial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  L Elit
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Educating women about breast cancer. An intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; June C Carroll; Ruth E Heisey; Vivek Goel; Wendy S Meschino; H Lavina A Lickley; Brian D Doan; Pamela L Chart; Vanessa Orr; Shelley Lothian
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Impact of familial risk and mammography screening on prognostic indicators of breast disease among women from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Kristine Cooper; Mitra Nabavi; Gord Glendon; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Frances P O'Malley; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Does perceived risk predict breast cancer screening use? Findings from a prospective cohort study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Prevalence of the BRCA1 founder mutation c.5266dupin Brazilian individuals at-risk for the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Ingrid P Ewald; Patrícia Izetti; Fernando R Vargas; Miguel Am Moreira; Aline S Moreira; Carlos A Moreira-Filho; Danielle R Cunha; Sara Hamaguchi; Suzi A Camey; Aishameriane Schmidt; Maira Caleffi; Patrícia Koehler-Santos; Roberto Giugliani; Patricia Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  Worry is good for breast cancer screening: a study of female relatives from the ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Li Rita Zhang; Anna M Chiarelli; Gord Glendon; Lucia Mirea; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.