Literature DB >> 3416148

Self examination of the breast: is it beneficial? Meta-analysis of studies investigating breast self examination and extent of disease in patients with breast cancer.

D Hill1, V White, D Jolley, K Mapperson.   

Abstract

The question whether the aggregated published research suggests that breast self examination is beneficial was explored in a meta-analysis of 12 studies including a total of 8118 patients with breast cancer that related the practice of breast self examination to regional lymph node state or tumour diameter. Based on the six studies for which data were available, 39% of patients (1115/2852) who reported having done breast self examination at least once before their illness had evidence of cancer in the lymph nodes compared with 50% of women (1348/2713) who had not done the examination. Logistic regression analysis showed this difference to be significant (odds ratio 0.66, confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74). Combining six studies which reported the circumstances of detection disclosed that 42% of women (272/652) who found their tumour while doing breast self examination had evidence of cancer in the nodes compared with 46% of women (871/1901) who found the tumour accidentally; this difference was not significant. Analysis of eight studies which used the diameter of the tumour to indicate the extent of disease tended to confirm the findings on lymph node state, in particular the benefit of premorbid breast self examination. Significantly fewer women who had practised the examination before the illness (56%; 1205/2137) had tumours of 2 cm or more diameter compared with women who had not practised the examination (66%; 1500/2260). The combined odds ratio for that analysis was 0.56, confidence interval 0.38 to 0.81. These findings appear to be good evidence of the benefit of encouraging women to practise self examination of the breasts regularly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3416148      PMCID: PMC1833942          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.297.6643.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  24 in total

1.  Breast self-examination and breast cancer: a note on postdisease reporting bias.

Authors:  H L Howe; M B Hoff
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1983

Review 2.  Control definition in case-control studies of the efficacy of screening and diagnostic testing.

Authors:  N S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Purposes and goals of breast self-examination.

Authors:  A I Holleb
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct

4.  Behavioral and biological determinants of surgical stage of breast cancer.

Authors:  K Gould-Martin; A Paganini-Hill; C Casagrande; T Mack; R K Ross
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Does a booklet on breast self-examination improve subsequent detection rates?

Authors:  J Turner; R Blaney; D Roy; W Odling-Smee; G Irwin; G Mackenzie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Breast self-examination, relationship to stage of breast cancer at diagnosis.

Authors:  J G Feldman; A C Carter; A D Nicastri; S T Hosat
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Breast self-examination practices and breast cancer survival.

Authors:  R S Foster; M C Costanza
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast self-examination: importance of technique in early diagnosis.

Authors:  T G Hislop; A J Coldman; D H Skippen
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Breast self-examination and medical examination related to breast cancer stage.

Authors:  R T Senie; P P Rosen; M L Lesser; D W Kinne
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Breast self-examination: clinical results from a population-based prospective study.

Authors:  J Philip; W G Harris; C Flaherty; C A Joslin; J H Rustage; D P Wijesinghe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

1.  Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Erblich; D H Bovbjerg; H B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  Should family physicians be teaching and encouraging women to perform regular breast self-examination?

Authors:  R Heisey; N Pimlott; M F Evans
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.

Authors:  A L Siu; E A McGlynn; H Morgenstern; M H Beers; D M Carlisle; E B Keeler; J Beloff; K Curtin; J Leaning; B C Perry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Practice of breast self examination: disease extent at diagnosis and patterns of surgical care. A report from an Italian study. GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Assessment of self-reward strategies for maintenance of breast self-examination.

Authors:  L J Solomon; B S Flynn; J K Worden; R M Mickey; J M Skelly; B M Geller; N W Peluso; J A Webster
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-02

6.  Breast self examination.

Authors:  P Wilson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-01

7.  Breast self examination: should we discourage it?

Authors:  D Mant
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

8.  How compliant is compliant? Evaluating adherence with breast self-exam positions.

Authors:  V M Stevens; J W Hatcher; B K Bruce
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-10

9.  The practice of breast self-examination results in the earlier detection and better clinical course of Japanese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Kurebayashi; K Shimozuma; H Sonoo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Cancer genetic counselees' self-reported psychological distress, changes in life, and adherence to recommended surveillance programs 3-7 years post counseling.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Richard Rosenquist; Claudia Lampic; Karin Nordin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.