Literature DB >> 12827473

Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.

Erol Gercek1, Vincent Arlet, Josee Delisle, Dante Marchesi.   

Abstract

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with anterior plating of the cervical spine is a well-accepted treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Recently, to minimise the extent of surgery, anterior interbody fusion with cages has become more common. While there are numerous reports on the primary stabilising effects of the different cervical cages, little is known about the subsidence behaviour of such cages in vivo. We retrospectively reviewed eight patients with cervical radiculopathy operated upon with anterior discectomy and fusion with a stand-alone titanium cervical cage. During surgery, only the cartilage portion of the end plate was removed and the cages were filled with autologous cancellous bone graft from the iliac crest. To assess possible subsidence or migration, three different radiographic measurements in the sagittal plane were taken for each case, postoperatively and at the latest follow-up. Subsidence was defined as any change in at least one of our parameters of at least 3 mm. Follow-up time was 12-18 months (average 15 months). Five of the nine fused levels had radiological signs of cage subsidence. No posterior or anterior migration was observed. However, subsidence did not correlate with clinical symptoms in four of the five patients. The remaining patient with signs of subsidence, whose neck pain and neurologic symptoms had regressed in the early postoperative course, suffered recurrence of radiculopathy 6 months after the surgery. Her symptoms were explained by the subsidence of the cage and the subsequent foraminal stenosis observed on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. At 15 months' follow-up, her cage was broken. Our preliminary results, so far limited in number, represent a serious warning to the proponents of stand-alone cervical cages

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827473      PMCID: PMC3468003          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of stand-alone cages and cages in combination with posterior fixation: a literature review.

Authors:  T R Oxland; T Lund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A systematic literature review to identify the best method for a single level anterior cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  J van Limbeek; W C Jacobs; P G Anderson; P W Pavlov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Rationale for interbody fusion with threaded titanium cages at cervical and lumbar levels. Results on 357 cases.

Authors:  G Matgé; T A Leclercq
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Cervical spine mechanics as a function of transection of components.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; A A White; R M Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate?

Authors:  J P Hollowell; D G Vollmer; C R Wilson; F A Pintar; N Yoganandan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Segmental variations of bone mineral density in the cervical spine.

Authors:  L J Curylo; R W Lindsey; B J Doherty; A LeBlanc
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Preliminary experience with anterior cervical microdiscectomy and interbody titanium cage fusion (Novus CT-Ti) in patients with cervical disc disease.

Authors:  G Profeta; R de Falco; G Ianniciello; L Profeta; A Cigliano; A I Raja
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2000-05

8.  A biomechanical analysis of decompression and reconstruction methods in the cervical spine. Emphasis on a carbon-fiber-composite cage.

Authors:  Y Shono; P C McAfee; B W Cunningham; J W Brantigan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A randomized prospective study of an anterior cervical interbody fusion device with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up results.

Authors:  R J Hacker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study.

Authors:  Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund; Davood Javid; Waclaw Leszniewski; Adel Shalabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  75 in total

1.  Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Pavel Barsa; Petr Suchomel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of the Variables Affecting the Incidence, Location, and Severity of Cage Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Operation.

Authors:  Andrew P Maccormick; Himanshu Sharma
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  Anterior multiple cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Roberto Bassani; Claudio Lamartina; Giovanni Casero; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yuqiao Chen; Guohua Lü; Bing Wang; Lei Li; Lei Kuang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Basic concepts in metal work failure after metastatic spine tumour surgery.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Ravish Patel; Anshuja Charvi Wadhwa; Aravind Kumar; Helena Maria Milavec; Dhiraj Sonawane; Gurpal Singh; Lorin Michael Benneker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The impact of menopause on bone fusion after the single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Sung Bae Park; Chun Kee Chung; Sang Hyung Lee; Hee-Jin Yang; Young-Je Son; Young Seob Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-12-31

8.  Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a PEEK cage and plate construct.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Sun-Jung Yoon; Kwang-Bok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparative Analysis of Interbody Cages Versus Tricortical Graft with Anterior Plate Fixation for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Pritish Singh; Ashok Kumar; Vishal Shekhawat
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.