Literature DB >> 17072576

Anterior cervical spinal fusion with the Intromed ZWE System: preliminary experience.

Johannes Schröder1, Florian Grosse-Dresselhaus, Christoph Schul, Hansdetlef Wassmann.   

Abstract

The implantation of a spacer is common practice after ventral discectomy in the cervical spine. Besides bone or bone cement (Palacos, Sulfix, and Allofix), the surgeon has the choice of a variety of factory-made implants (cages). We report on our experience with the Intromed ZWE [Zwischenwirbel-Ersatzsystem (Intervertebral Replacement System)] implant. The ZWE implant (Intromed Medizintechnik GmbH, 15754, Senzig, Germany), made from titanium 6AL 4V, consists of a flat quadrangular body with a large supporting surface on the bottom and top and a central hole. We report the first 100 cases treated with their 1- or 2-year follow-up completed (mean follow-up, 1.7 years). The mean age was 47+/-9 years (range: 27-73 years). The implantation was performed without filling the central hole. In addition to the clinical investigation of neurological alterations and the range of movement, X-rays were taken, and the clinical result was determined by an independent investigator according to the Odom Scale. After the minimum follow-up of 1 year, 32 patients scored excellent on the Odom scale, 38 patients good, 25 patients satisfactory, and 5 patients bad. In 74 cases, fusion occurred radiologically as bony bridging around the implant. In 21 cases, the cage showed no change and no radiolucency. In five cases, radiolucency around the implant occurred without instability at flexion-extension X-ray views. In CT scans done in two patients with complaints, we confirmed bony bridging inside the centre hole implanted empty. The Intromed-ZWE-System performs well in routine clinical use. Compared to bone or bone cement, the operating time is reduced. The Intromed System offers an easy fusion method for a competitive price.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17072576     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-006-0043-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  24 in total

1.  Rationale for interbody fusion with threaded titanium cages at cervical and lumbar levels. Results on 357 cases.

Authors:  G Matgé; T A Leclercq
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  [Vertebral fusion by a ventral approach in cervical intervertebral disk disorders].

Authors:  A DEREYMAEKER; J MULIER
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1958-12       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Surgical approaches to the vertebral bodies in the cervical and lumbar regions.

Authors:  W O SOUTHWICK; R A ROBINSON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1957-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  R C Bishop; K A Moore; M N Hadley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Preliminary experience of carbon fibre cage prostheses for treatment of cervical spine disorders.

Authors:  N S Brooke; A W Rorke; A T King; R W Gullan
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  [Proceedings: Unconforaminectomy in lesions of the vertebral artery and the cervical nerve roots].

Authors:  A Jung; P Kehr; M Hamid
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1974-08

7.  [Ventral approach to the cervical spine].

Authors:  R Louis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Olaf Leheta; Joachim K Krauss; Dimitris Zevgaridis
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-01

9.  Impact of smoking on the outcome of anterior cervical arthrodesis with interbody or strut-grafting.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; M A Fye; S E Emery; M A Palumbo; H H Bohlman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.

Authors:  E M Younger; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Is the bone fusion affected by Modic-2 changes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Authors:  Kangkang Huang; Ying Hong; Hao Liu; Yuchen Duan; Beiyu Wang; Hua Chen; Chen Ding; Xin Rong; Tingkui Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.