Literature DB >> 22644259

The impact of individual quality of life assessment on psychosocial attention in patients with chest malignancies: a randomized study.

Mercedes Nicklasson1, Magnus L Elfström, Jan Olofson, Bengt Bergman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of individual health-related quality of life (HRQL) evaluation on the attention towards symptom control and psychosocial function in advanced cancer patients.
METHODS: Patients with advanced lung cancer or mesothelioma who attended a pulmonary oncology outpatient clinic were randomized to either of two strategies for HRQL assessment. The experimental group (EG) answered the EORTC QLQ-C30 + LC13 questionnaire using a digital table interface, with outprint of aggregated scale scores presented to the consulting physician as a support for evaluation. The control group (CG) answered a paper version of the same questionnaire, which was stored for later analysis. Consultations were audio-recorded. Outcome measures were a quantitative content analysis of audio-recorded consultations and medical and psychosocial interventions abstracted from clinical records.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients were randomized and participated in the study. Issues regarding emotional function were more frequently discussed during consultations in the EG (p < 0.05). Similarly, interventions directed to emotional and social concerns were more frequent in the EG (p = 0.013 and p = 0.0036, respectively). HRQL measures over time were similar across the groups.
CONCLUSION: Individual HRQL assessment increased the attention to psychosocial functioning in patients with chest malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644259     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1496-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  25 in total

1.  Quality of life evaluation in oncological clinical trials - the EORTC model. The EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.

Authors:  J de Haes; D Curran; T Young; A Bottomley; H Flechtner; N Aaronson; J Blazeby; K Bjordal; Y Brandberg; E Greimel; J Maher; M Sprangers; A Cull
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Development of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning dimension.

Authors:  Morten Aa Petersen; Mogens Groenvold; Neil K Aaronson; Wei-Chu Chie; Thierry Conroy; Anna Costantini; Peter Fayers; Jorunn Helbostad; Bernhard Holzner; Stein Kaasa; Susanne Singer; Galina Velikova; Teresa Young
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Are the most distressing concerns of patients with inoperable lung cancer adequately assessed? A mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Carol Tishelman; Malin Lövgren; Eva Broberger; Katarina Hamberg; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The patient-physician relationship. Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: an observational study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; M J Muller; L D Wever; J H Schornagel; N K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Health-related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30--reference values from a large sample of Swedish population.

Authors:  H Michelson; C Bolund; B Nilsson; Y Brandberg
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Physicians' psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient communication skills.

Authors:  W Levinson; D Roter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The validity and clinical utility of symptom monitoring in advanced lung cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Mehul K Soni; David Cella; Gregory A Masters; Steven P Burch; Anne Heyes; Cheryl Silberman
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  Assessment is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of HRQL assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Sarah K Rosenbloom; David E Victorson; Elizabeth A Hahn; Amy H Peterman; David Cella
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Psychopathological profile and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Vincenzo O Palmieri; Daniela Santovito; Francesco Margari; Madia Lozupone; Francesco Minerva; Carla Di Gennaro; Orlando Todarello; Giuseppe Palasciano
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 3.  Head and Neck Cancer: Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Augusta Silveira; Eurico Monteiro; Teresa Sequeira
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01

4.  Toward a socio-spiritual approach? A mixed-methods systematic review on the social and spiritual needs of patients in the palliative phase of their illness.

Authors:  Tom Lormans; Everlien de Graaf; Joep van de Geer; Frederieke van der Baan; Carlo Leget; Saskia Teunissen
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Benefit Finding and Related Factors of Patients with Early-Stage Cancer in China.

Authors:  Xichenhui Qiu; Kefan Zhang; Yan Zhang; Liyuan Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Patients' experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Liam Carfora; Ciara M Foley; Phillip Hagi-Diakou; Phillip J Lesty; Marianne L Sandstrom; Imogen Ramsey; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 7.  The use and impact of quality of life assessment tools in clinical care settings for cancer patients, with a particular emphasis on brain cancer: insights from a systematic review and stakeholder consultations.

Authors:  Sarah King; Josephine Exley; Sarah Parks; Sarah Ball; Teresa Bienkowska-Gibbs; Calum MacLure; Emma Harte; Katherine Stewart; Jody Larkin; Andrew Bottomley; Sonja Marjanovic
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem.

Authors:  Clare Ellis-Smith; Irene J Higginson; Barbara A Daveson; Lesley A Henson; Catherine J Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caitlin Graupner; Merel L Kimman; Suzanne Mul; Annerika H M Slok; Danny Claessens; Jos Kleijnen; Carmen D Dirksen; Stéphanie O Breukink
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.603

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.