Literature DB >> 13963807

Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance.

W HODOS, G KALMAN.   

Abstract

The progressive ratio schedule requires the subject to emit an increasing number of responses for each successive reinforcement. Eventually, the response requirement becomes so large that the subject fails to respond for a period of 15 min and thereby terminates the session. This point is arbitrarily defined as the "breaking point" of the subject's performance. The measure is quantified in terms of the number of responses in the final completed (i.e., reinforced) ratio run of the session. Previous work has shown that this measure varies as a function of several motivational variables and may thus be useful as an index of reinforcement strength. The present study is an extension of that work. The subjects were four rats. In the first experiment, the effects of the size of the increment by which each ratio run increased were studied. In two additional experiments, the volume of a liquid reinforcer was varied using both large and small ratio increments. The results indicate that the number of responses in the final completed ratio run increases as a function of the size of the ratio increment. However, the number of reinforcements obtained by the animals per session declines sharply. When large ratio increments are used, the number of responses in the final ratio increases as a function of the volume of the reinforcer, but when small increments are used, progressive satiation results in a decline in performance with the larger volumes of liquid.

Entities:  

Keywords:  REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 13963807      PMCID: PMC1404462          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  An evaluation of response rate as a measure of rewarding intracranial stimulation.

Authors:  W HODOS; E S VALENSTEIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

2.  Relation of amount of primary reinforcement to discrimination and to secondary reinforcement strength.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-12

3.  Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength.

Authors:  W HODOS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Equal-reinforcement values for sucrose and glucose solutions compared with equal-sweetness values.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-10
  4 in total
  95 in total

1.  Progressive-ratio schedules: effects of later schedule requirements on earlier performances.

Authors:  A Baron; A Derenne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Firing rate of nucleus accumbens neurons is dopamine-dependent and reflects the timing of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  S M Nicola; S A Deadwyler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.

Authors:  H S Roane; D C Lerman; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

4.  Progressive-ratio performance in the rhesus monkey maintained by opiate infusions.

Authors:  F Hoffmeister
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-04-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF CONCURRENT PROGRESSIVE RATIO BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  J F DARDANO; D SAUERBRUNN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On distinguishing progressively increasing response requirements for reinforcement.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

7.  What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry D Schlinger; Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

8.  Immediate postsession feeding reduces operant responding in rats.

Authors:  John R Smethells; Andrew T Fox; Jennifer J Andrews; Mark P Reilly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; P R Killeen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Animal models of drug craving.

Authors:  A Markou; F Weiss; L H Gold; S B Caine; G Schulteis; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.