Literature DB >> 12593324

On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.

Jeffrey N Weatherly1, Karyn M Plumm, Julia R Smith, William A Roberts.   

Abstract

Rats' rates of leverpressing for low-concentration liquid-sucrose reinforcers in the first half of an experimental session increase when food pellet, rather than sucrose, reinforcers will be available in the second half. Experiment 1 determined that this induction effect was the outcome of food pellet reinforcement's increasing response rates, not of continued sucrose reinforcement's decreasing them. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that induction was primarily controlled by the conditions of reinforcement in the current session, not by those in the previous one. Experiment 4 showed little evidence that the induction was the outcome of Pavlovian processes. These results suggest that induction may occur because of processes operating at the level of the entire session. They also provide a link to a seemingly related area of study: contrast effects. Some of the results are consistent with what is known about contrast effects, but there are also several, yet unexplained differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12593324     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Learn Behav        ISSN: 0090-4996


  15 in total

1.  Progressive-ratio schedules: effects of later schedule requirements on earlier performances.

Authors:  A Baron; A Derenne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Habituation To The Reinforcer May Contribute To Multiple-schedule Behavioral Contrast.

Authors:  F McSweeney; J Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Decremental carryover effects of sucrose ingestion in the negative anticipatory contrast procedure in rats.

Authors:  W Timberlake; M Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-10

9.  From contrast to reinforcement: role of response contingency in anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  C F Flaherty; P S Grigson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-04

10.  Within-session responding when different reinforcers are delivered in each half of the session.

Authors:  J N Weatherly; J E Stout; A S McMurry; H C Rue; C L Melville
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.