Literature DB >> 1467690

Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

R Fitzpatrick1, A Fletcher, S Gore, D Jones, D Spiegelhalter, D Cox.   

Abstract

Many clinicians remain unsure of the relevance of measuring quality of life to their clinical practice. In health economics quality of life measures have become the standard means of assessing the results of health care interventions and, more controversially, the means of prioritising funding; but they have many other applications. This article--the first of three on measuring quality of life--reviews the instruments available and their application in screening programmes, audit, health care research, and clinical trials. Using the appropriate instrument is essential if outcome measures are to be valid and clinically meaningful.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1467690      PMCID: PMC1883623          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  27 in total

1.  Mortality predictors among 263 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J P Leigh; J F Fries
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 2.  Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Schumacher; M Olschewski; G Schulgen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Clinical biostatistics. XLI. Hard science, soft data, and the challenges of choosing clinical variables in research.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Measurement of health status in patients with chronic illness: comparison of the Nottingham health profile and the general health questionnaire.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Patient versus clinician item generation for quality-of-life measures. The case of language-disabled adults.

Authors:  J Lomas; L Pickard; A Mohide
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires.

Authors:  P Tugwell; C Bombardier; W W Buchanan; C Goldsmith; E Grace; K J Bennett; H J Williams; M Egger; G S Alarcon; M Guttadauria
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-01

7.  Measuring health changes among severely ill patients. The floor phenomenon.

Authors:  A B Bindman; D Keane; N Lurie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians' offices?

Authors:  E C Nelson; J M Landgraf; R D Hays; J H Wasson; J W Kirk
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; S Ziebland; C Jenkinson; A Mowat; A Mowat
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

10.  Ratings of the importance of quality of life variables: therapeutic implications for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; G A Lockwood; N F Boyd
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  132 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and regulatory issues. An assessment of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) recommendations on the use of HR-QOL measures in drug approval.

Authors:  G Apolone; G De Carli; M Brunetti; S Garattini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  K W Smith; N E Avis; S F Assmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

Review 4.  Education and debate: Reconfiguring health systems.

Authors:  Andy Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-30

5.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: a community based study in Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors:  T V Perneger; J F Etter; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Quality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretation.

Authors:  A Fletcher; S Gore; D Jones; R Fitzpatrick; D Spiegelhalter; D Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-07

Review 8.  Pharmaceutical care programmes for the elderly: economic issues.

Authors:  Grainne E Crealey; Ian K Sturgess; James C McElnay; Carmel M Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Quality of life assessment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E J Irvine
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  The range of the Oxford Shoulder Score in the asymptomatic population: a marker for post-operative improvement.

Authors:  F Younis; J Sultan; S Dix; P J Hughes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.