Literature DB >> 10831992

Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term.

A S Maslow1, A L Sweeny.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of elective induction on the risk of cesarean delivery in a cohort of women with low-risk term pregnancies and to evaluate the costs of elective induction services within our hospital system.
METHODS: Records of 1135 eligible women with low-risk, singleton, vertex pregnancies at 38-41 weeks' gestation who were eligible for vaginal delivery were analyzed retrospectively after elective induction (n = 263) or spontaneous labor (n = 872). Outcome measures included cesarean delivery and direct costs. Variables evaluated were parity, maternal age, estimated gestational age, birth weight, prior cesarean delivery, epidural anesthetic use, and provider category. Analysis was by univariable and multivariable regression modeling.
RESULTS: Elective induction placed nulliparas at a twofold higher risk for cesarean delivery (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 4.9) after adjustment for birth weight, maternal age, and gestational age. We found a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery with increased birth weight for nulliparas (2-66.7%). Increasing maternal age increased the risk of cesarean delivery in all parity groups (P <.05), but particularly among nulliparas (3-26.3%) (P <.001). Electively induced labors that ended in vaginal delivery cost $273 more and required an average of 4 hours more in the hospital before delivery than did noninduced vaginal deliveries (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: Elective induction significantly increased the risk of cesarean delivery for nulliparas, and increased in-hospital predelivery time and costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831992     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00794-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  33 in total

1.  Term induction of labor and risk of cesarean delivery by parity.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Adi Hirshberg; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-09

2.  Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol versus the Foley catheter.

Authors:  Methodius G Tuuli; Mary B Keegan; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly Roehl; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Is elective induction safe? A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Vidya Ramasamy; Suchitra Thunga; S R Nayak
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-02-14

4.  Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Judy Jou; Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela Jo Johnson; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Induction rates and delivery outcomes after a policy limiting elective inductions.

Authors:  Kelly Yamasato; Marguerite Bartholomew; Marsha Durbin; Chieko Kimata; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05

6.  Impact of a Policy to Deliver at 39 Weeks for the Indication of Class III Obesity.

Authors:  Stephanie L Pierce; Marta E Maxted; Jennifer D Peck; Jessica S Lutz; Maria F Lopez-Davila; Frederico Vieira; Courtney B Atchley; Rodney K Edwards
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 7.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

8.  Timing and Mode of Delivery in Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease- an Analysis of Practices within the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC).

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Tina Ahn Thu Thi Nguyen; Myriam Almeida-Jones; Nina Boe; Laila Rhee; Tracy Anton; Mark Sklansky; Maryam Tarsa; Gary Satou; Anita J Moon-Grady
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Risk of cesarean section after induced versus spontaneous labor at term gestation.

Authors:  Hye Ran Lee; Mi-Na Kim; Ji Yeon You; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22

10.  Epidemiologic considerations: scope of problem and disparity concerns.

Authors:  Darios Getahun
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.