Literature DB >> 24614814

Epidemiologic considerations: scope of problem and disparity concerns.

Darios Getahun1.   

Abstract

Elective labor induction is an increasingly common practice not only in high-income countries but also in many low-income and middle-income countries. Many questions remain unanswered on the safety and cost-effectiveness of elective labor induction, particularly in resource-constrained settings wherein there may be a high unmet need for medically indicated inductions, as well as limited or no access to appropriate medications and equipment for induction and monitoring, comprehensive emergency obstetric care, safe, and timely cesarean section, and appropriate supervision from health professionals. This article considers the global perspective on the epidemiology, practices, safety, and costs associated with elective labor induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24614814      PMCID: PMC4008709          DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  30 in total

1.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication.

Authors:  S Dublin; M Lydon-Rochelle; R C Kaplan; D H Watts; C W Critchlow
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Indications for labor induction. Differences between university and community hospitals.

Authors:  L A Beebe; W F Rayburn; C M Beaty; K L Eberly; J R Stanley; L A Rayburn
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989-1998.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Michael K Yancey; Cassandra E Henderson
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Elective induction of labour in the obstetrical practice.

Authors:  L G Lampé
Journal:  Acta Chir Hung       Date:  1986

5.  Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome.

Authors:  J A Macer; C L Macer; L S Chan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.

Authors:  S T Seyb; R J Berka; M L Socol; S L Dooley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Induction of labor in the absence of standard medical indications: incidence and correlates.

Authors:  Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Vicky Cárdenas; Jennifer C Nelson; Victoria L Holt; Carolyn Gardella; Thomas R Easterling
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; Vandana Sundaram; Anjali J Kaimal; Allison Gienger; Yvonne W Cheng; Kathryn M McDonald; Brian L Shaffer; Douglas K Owens; Dena M Bravata
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Births: final data for 2010.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Stephanie J Ventura; Michelle J K Osterman; Elizabeth C Wilson; T J Mathews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2012-08-28

10.  Unmet need for induction of labor in Africa: secondary analysis from the 2004 - 2005 WHO Global Maternal and Perinatal Health Survey (A cross-sectional survey).

Authors:  Fawole Bukola; Nafiou Idi; Machoki M'Mimunya; Wolomby-Molondo Jean-Jose; Mugerwa Kidza; Neves Isilda; Amokrane Faouzi; Shah Archana; Souza Joao Paulo; Mathai Matthews; Gulmezoglu Metin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Zainab Hananah Abang Abdullah; Kah Teik Chew; V Ramesh V Velayudham; Zainab Yahaya; Amilia Afzan Mohd Jamil; Muhammad Azrai Abu; Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani; Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Uterocervical Angle Combined with Bishop Score as a Predictor for Successful Induction of Labor in Term Vaginal Delivery.

Authors:  Seung-Woo Yang; Seo-Yeon Kim; Han-Sung Hwang; Hee-Sun Kim; In-Sook Sohn; Han-Sung Kwon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.