Literature DB >> 25272996

Induction rates and delivery outcomes after a policy limiting elective inductions.

Kelly Yamasato1, Marguerite Bartholomew, Marsha Durbin, Chieko Kimata, Bliss Kaneshiro.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess induction rates, maternal, and neonatal outcomes following adoption of a policy prohibiting elective inductions at less than 39 weeks gestation and inductions between 39 and 41 weeks with an unfavorable cervix. A retrospective cohort study of all deliveries greater than or equal to 37 weeks gestation was conducted 1 year prior to through 1 year after implementation of the induction policy. Induction rates before and after the policy were calculated as the primary outcome while maternal and neonatal conditions were assessed as secondary outcomes. Elective inductions (p = 0.016), elective inductions less than 39 weeks gestation (p = 0.020), and elective inductions 39-40 weeks and 6 days gestation with an unfavorable cervix (p = 0.031) decreased significantly following adoption of the policy. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, including rates of cesarean deliveries, postpartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions remained unchanged, though this study was not adequately powered to detect differences in these outcomes. An institutional induction policy was associated with a reduction in elective inductions prior to 39 weeks and up to 40 weeks and 6 days with an unfavorable cervix. These reductions were not accompanied by change in maternal or neonatal outcomes at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25272996     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1612-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  20 in total

1.  Neonatal outcomes after implementation of guidelines limiting elective delivery before 39 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Deborah B Ehrenthal; Matthew K Hoffman; Xiaozhang Jiang; Gordon Ostrum
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Francis P J M Vrouenraets; Frans J M E Roumen; Cary J G Dehing; Eline S A van den Akker; Maureen J B Aarts; Esther J T Scheve
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system.

Authors:  Bryan T Oshiro; Erick Henry; Janie Wilson; D Ware Branch; Michael W Varner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0/7)-38(6/7) weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Edward F Donovan; Carole Lannon; Jennifer Bailit; Barbara Rose; Jay D Iams; Terri Byczkowski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Sarah Osmundson; Robin J Ou-Yang; William A Grobman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Term labor induction compared with expectant management.

Authors:  J Christopher Glantz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Perinatal outcomes in low-risk term pregnancies: do they differ by week of gestation?

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; James M Nicholson; Sanae Nakagawa; Tim A Bruckner; A Eugene Washington; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; Vandana Sundaram; Anjali J Kaimal; Allison Gienger; Yvonne W Cheng; Kathryn M McDonald; Brian L Shaffer; Douglas K Owens; Dena M Bravata
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Brian M Mercer; Mary D'Alton; Sarah Kilpatrick; Sean Blackwell; George Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Liping Sun; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.623

View more
  2 in total

1.  Discrepancy Between Identification of Early-Term Elective Deliveries by Manual Chart Review and Data Vendor.

Authors:  Kelly Yamasato; Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Marguerite Bartholomew; Marsha Durbin; Chieko Kimata; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2016-12

2.  Maternal perceptions of the experience of attempted labor induction and medically elective inductions: analysis of survey results from listening to mothers in California.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald Iverson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.