Literature DB >> 23204688

Is elective induction safe? A prospective analysis.

Vidya Ramasamy1, Suchitra Thunga, S R Nayak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify whether electively induced labor places the mother or her fetus at an increased risk as compared to her spontaneous labor cohort. To quantify the risk of cesarean section in the induced group.
METHODS: A prospective analysis comparing 200 electively induced parturients with 200 matched controls who labored spontaneously, in 1 year from April 2007 to April 2008. The parturients were between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation and had no complications necessitating induction.
RESULTS: Induction per se was not associated with a statistically significant increase in cesarean section rates. Only when associated with nulliparity, low bishop score, and birth weight >3.5 kg, the risk of cesarean increases.
CONCLUSION: Elective induction does not appear to pose an increased risk to the mother or her fetus in a carefully selected patient population. However, when associated with risk factors the cesarean rate increases. Hence informed consent should be taken before induction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section rates; Elective induction

Year:  2012        PMID: 23204688      PMCID: PMC3307936          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-011-0109-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  6 in total

1.  Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term.

Authors:  A S Maslow; A L Sweeny
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Francis P J M Vrouenraets; Frans J M E Roumen; Cary J G Dehing; Eline S A van den Akker; Maureen J B Aarts; Esther J T Scheve
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.

Authors:  Anjel Vahratian; Jun Zhang; James F Troendle; Anthony C Sciscione; Matthew K Hoffman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  M Prysak; F C Castronova
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome.

Authors:  J A Macer; C L Macer; L S Chan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor.

Authors:  L P Smith; B A Nagourney; F H McLean; R H Usher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-03-01       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Delivery route following elective induction of labor at term: analysis of 807 patients.

Authors:  Meghan I Rattigan; Andrew L Atkinson; Jonathan D Baum
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-06-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.