Literature DB >> 10823430

Outcome scores in degenerative cervical disc surgery.

B Zoëga1, J Kärrholm, B Lind.   

Abstract

Forty-six consecutive patients with neck pain and arm radiculopathy were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. All patients had neurological symptoms corresponding to a herniated disc and/or spondylosis at one or two cervical levels, verified by magnetic resonance imaging. The patients were stabilized with an anterior graft and randomized to either fixation with a CSLP plate or no internal fixation. Preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively the patients filled in a questionnaire that included a modified Million Index, a modified Oswestry Index and the Zung Depression Scale. They were also asked to register their pain in the arm and in the neck on a vertical visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 2-year follow-up, an unbiased observer graded the patients' clinical outcome using Odom's criteria. A test-retest procedure was carried out to examine the questionnaire reproducibility. In the group that was operated at one level, there was no significant improvement in any of the scores. Nevertheless, 81% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. All scores improved in the group operated at two levels. The pain in the neck and arm, as measured on a VAS, decreased in both groups. The improvement in arm pain was significantly more pronounced in patients operated with a plate at two levels compared to those who were operated without a plate. At the 2-year follow-up, patients with an excellent or good result according to Odom's criteria had a lower Million Index (P < 0.0005), Oswestry Index (P < 0.0005), and Zung (P = 0.024) score, than the group classified as fair or poor. There was a significant correlation (P < 0.0001 for all scores) between the test and retest results. We conclude that the modified Million Index and Oswestry Index are clinically useful tools in the evaluation of outcome after degenerative cervical disc surgery. The clinical benefits of plate fixation were minimal. The outcome after surgery, measured with the Oswestry Index, Million Index and VAS for arm and neck pain, seems to correlate well with the classification of outcome by Odom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10823430      PMCID: PMC3611372          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

Review 1.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Authors:  U Müller; M S Duetz; C Roeder; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Back related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Urs Müller; Christoph Röder; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Michael Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Long-term randomised comparison between a carbon fibre cage and the Cloward procedure in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Evaluation of psychosomatic distress and its influence in the outcomes of lumbar fusion procedures for degenerative disorders of the spine.

Authors:  Emiliano Vialle; Barbara Miroski de Oliveira Pinto; Luiz Roberto Vialle; Juan David Castro Gomez
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-07

6.  Bone loss of the superior adjacent vertebral body immediately posterior to the anterior flange of Bryan cervical disc.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Kim; Young Sun Chung; Alexander E Ropper; Kyung Hoon Min; Tae Keun Ahn; Keun Soo Won; Dong Ah Shin; In Bo Han
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Investigation of clinically important benefit of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Chang Hyoun Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-03-31

9.  Plasma disc decompression for contained cervical disc herniation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Cesaroni; Pier Vittorio Nardi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Håkan Löfgren; M Engquist; P Hoffmann; B Sigstedt; L Vavruch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.