Literature DB >> 19902277

Plasma disc decompression for contained cervical disc herniation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Alessandro Cesaroni1, Pier Vittorio Nardi.   

Abstract

Prospective case series studies have shown that plasma disc decompression (PDD) using the COBLATION SpineWand device (ArthroCare Corporation, Austin, TX) is effective for decompressing the disc nucleus in symptomatic contained cervical disc herniations. This prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous PDD as compared to conservative care (CC) through 1 year. Patients (n = 115) had neck/arm pain >50 on the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale and had failed at least 30 days of failed CC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either PDD (n = 62) or CC (n = 58). Clinical outcome was determined by VAS pain score, neck disability index (NDI) score, and SF-36 health survey, collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The PDD group had significantly lower VAS pain scores at all follow-up time points (PDD vs. CC: 6 weeks, -46.87 +/- 2.71 vs. -15.26 +/- 1.97; 3 months, -53.16 +/- 2.74 vs. -30.45 +/- 2.59; 6 months, -56.22 +/- 2.63 vs. -40.26 +/- 2.56; 1 year, -65.73 +/- 2.24 vs. -36.45 +/- 2.86; GEE, P < 0.0001). PDD patients also had significant NDI score improvement over baseline when compared to CC patients at the 6 weeks (PDD vs. CC: -9.15 +/- 1.06 vs. -4.61 +/- 0.53, P < 0.0001) and 1 year (PDD vs. CC: -16.70 +/- 0.29 vs. -12.40 +/- 1.26, P = 0.005) follow-ups. PDD patients showed statistically significant improvement over baseline in SF-36 physical component summary scores when compared to CC patients at 6 weeks and 1 year (PDD vs. CC: 8.86 + 8.04 vs. 4.24 +/- 3.79, P = 0.0004; 17.64 +/- 10.37 vs. 10.50 +/- 10.6, P = 0.0003, respectively). In patients who had neck/arm pain due to a contained cervical disc herniation, PDD was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes than a CC regimen. At 1 year, CC patients appeared to suffer a "relapse, showing signs of decline in most measurements, whereas PDD patients showed continued stable improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19902277      PMCID: PMC2899766          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1189-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  66 in total

1.  Outcome scores in degenerative cervical disc surgery.

Authors:  B Zoëga; J Kärrholm; B Lind
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Loss of inter-vertebral disc height after anterior cervical discectomy.

Authors:  N Haden; M Latimer; H M Seeley; R J Laing
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Jan J M Pool; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Jan L Hoving; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Steven D Glassman; David W Polly; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Histologic evidence of absorption of sequestration-type herniated disc.

Authors:  T Ito; M Yamada; F Ikuta; T Fukuda; S I Hoshi; Y Kawaji; S Uchiyama; T Homma; H E Takahashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain.

Authors:  Samantha Wlodyka-Demaille; Serge Poiraudeau; Jean-François Catanzariti; François Rannou; Jacques Fermanian; Michel Revel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  The classic. Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. By Lyman W. Smith. 1964.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing nucleoplasty-based percutaneous discectomy.

Authors:  Peter C Gerszten; William C Welch; Joseph T King
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-01

10.  The pathomorphologic changes that accompany the resolution of cervical radiculopathy. A prospective study with repeat magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Bush; R Chaudhuri; S Hillier; J Penny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Morphological changes in disc herniation in the lower cervical spine: an ultrastructural study.

Authors:  Ingrid Sitte; Anton Kathrein; Florian Pedross; Martin C Freund; Kristian Pfaller; Charles W Archer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Neck pain with radiculopathy.

Authors:  Dimpu Bhagawati; Stephen Gwilym
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Judith Divera de Rooij; Pravesh Shankar Gadjradj; Hans Aukes; George Groeneweg; Caroline Margina Speksnijder; Frank Johannes Huygen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.832

Review 4.  Surgery versus conservative care for neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marienke van Middelkoop; Sidney M Rubinstein; Raymond Ostelo; Maurits W van Tulder; Wilco Peul; Bart W Koes; Arianne P Verhagen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical outcomes of percutaneous plasma disc coagulation therapy for lumbar herniated disc diseases.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Kim; Sung Chul Kim; Ki Hong Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-01-31

6.  Long term follow-up of cervical intervertebral disc herniation inpatients treated with integrated complementary and alternative medicine: a prospective case series observational study.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Baek; Jae Woo Oh; Joon-Shik Shin; Jinho Lee; Yoon Jae Lee; Me-riong Kim; Yong-jun Ahn; Areum Choi; Ki Byung Park; Byung-Cheul Shin; Myeong Soo Lee; In-Hyuk Ha
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.659

7.  Efficacy of coblation technology in treating cervical discogenic upper back pain.

Authors:  Liangliang He; Yuanzhang Tang; Xiuliang Li; Na Li; Jiaxiang Ni; Liangliang He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Percutaneous cervical laser diskectomy, thermoannuloplasty, and thermonucleoplasty; comparable results without surgery.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-06-21

9.  Coblation annuloplasty in cervical discogenic pain without radiculopathy.

Authors:  Liangliang He; Jiaxiang Ni; Baishan Wu; Jianing Yue; Guoqing Cao; Yuna Guo; Liqiang Yang
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.195

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.