Literature DB >> 10793900

A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects.

S Nishida1, H Ashida.   

Abstract

Interocular transfer of the motion aftereffect (MAE) has been extensively investigated for the purpose of analysing the binocularity of the underlying motion mechanism. Previous studies unanimously reported that the transfer of the classical static MAE is partial, but there is a controversy as to whether the transfer of the flicker MAE (MAE measured using counterphase gratings) is partial or perfect. To gain insight into the discrepancy between studies, we investigated whether the interocular transfer of the flicker MAE is influenced by the MAE measurement method, retinal eccentricity and attention. Our results showed that the transfer was perfect or nearly so when the MAE duration was measured in the central visual field with observers paying attention to the adaptation stimulus, but the transfer was partial when the MAE nulling strength was measured, when the MAE duration was measured in the peripheral visual field, or when the observers' attention was distracted by a secondary task. These results not only resolve discrepancies between previous studies, but also suggest that the flicker MAE reflects adaptation at multiple stages in the hierarchical architecture of motion processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10793900     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00176-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The surface and deep structure of the waterfall illusion.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wade; Martina Ziefle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

3.  Dissociation of first- and second-order motion systems by perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Charles Chubb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Motion adaptation does not depend on attention to the adaptor.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Sustained attention is not necessary for velocity adaptation.

Authors:  Michael Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Directional remapping in tactile inter-finger apparent motion: a motion aftereffect study.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Kunihiko Mabuchi; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Efferent influences on the bioelectrical activity of the retina in primates.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; J Vernon Odom; Christopher L Passaglia; Radouil T Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 8.  The motion aftereffect reloaded.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Rapid volitional control of apparent motion during percept generation.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Laura Ortega; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Motion aftereffects transfer between touch and vision.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Qi Wang; Vincent Hayward; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.