Literature DB >> 23902752

Sustained attention is not necessary for velocity adaptation.

Michael Morgan1.   

Abstract

Prolonged adaptation to a stimulus, such as a drifting grating, lowers sensitivity for detecting similar stimuli, and changes their appearance, for example, making gratings of the same orientation appear of lower contrast and move more slowly. It has been suggested that adaptation is increased by sustained attention to the adapting stimulus and is decreased by distracting attention with a competing task. This paper describes a novel 2AFC (spatial) measure of adaptation in which adaptation and bias are carefully distinguished by the random interleaving of different test conditions. The experiment revealed significant adaptation of perceived velocity, but no effect of attentional distraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; aftereffects; attention

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23902752      PMCID: PMC4135073          DOI: 10.1167/13.8.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  29 in total

1.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Sophie Schwartz; Patrik Vuilleumier; Chloe Hutton; Angelo Maravita; Raymond J Dolan; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  A motion illusion generated by afternystagmus suppression.

Authors:  A Chaudhuri
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1990-10-02       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Duje Tadin; Kenith V Sobel; Tony A Raissian; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion.

Authors:  M J Lankheet; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task.

Authors:  G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  A Johnston; M J Wright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Hemifield differences in perceived velocity.

Authors:  A T Smith; P Hammond
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Predicting the motion after-effect from sensitivity loss.

Authors:  M Morgan; C Chubb; J A Solomon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  9 in total

1.  A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Nathan Witthoft; Long Sha; Jonathan Winawer; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Are high-level aftereffects perceptual?

Authors:  Katherine R Storrs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

4.  Effects of crowding and attention on high-levels of motion processing and motion adaptation.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Tilted frames of reference have similar effects on the perception of gravitational vertical and the planning of vertical saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Simon Grant; Dean Melmoth; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Low-level mediation of directionally specific motion aftereffects: Motion perception is not necessary.

Authors:  M J Morgan; K Schreiber; J A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Susceptibility to Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions in autistic children: a comparison of three different methods.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Michael J Morgan; Craig T W Allen; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 7.509

8.  Numerosity adaptation partly depends on the allocation of implicit numerosity-contingent visuo-spatial attention.

Authors:  Paolo A Grasso; Giovanni Anobile; Roberto Arrighi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods.

Authors:  M J Morgan; D Melmoth; J A Solomon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.