Literature DB >> 18841387

The surface and deep structure of the waterfall illusion.

Nicholas J Wade1, Martina Ziefle.   

Abstract

The surface structure of the waterfall illusion or motion aftereffect (MAE) is its phenomenal visibility. Its deep structure will be examined in the context of a model of space and motion perception. The MAE can be observed following protracted observation of a pattern that is translating, rotating, or expanding/contracting, a static pattern appears to move in the opposite direction. The phenomenon has long been known, and it continues to present novel properties. One of the novel features of MAEs is that they can provide an ideal visual assay for distinguishing local from global processes. Motion during adaptation can be induced in a static central grating by moving surround gratings; the MAE is observed in the static central grating but not in static surrounds. The adaptation phase is local and the test phase is global. That is, localised adaptation can be expressed in different ways depending on the structure of the test display. These aspects of MAEs can be exploited to determine a variety of local/global interactions. Six experiments on MAEs are reported. The results indicated that relational motion is required to induce an MAE; the region adapted extends beyond that stimulated; storage can be complete when the MAE is not seen during the storage period; interocular transfer (IOT) is around 30% of monocular MAEs with phase alternation; large field spiral patterns yield MAEs with characteristic monocular and binocular interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18841387     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0170-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  17 in total

1.  A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects.

Authors:  S Nishida; H Ashida
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Motion over the retina and the motion aftereffect.

Authors:  M T Swanston; N J Wade
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  The aftereffect to relative motion does not show interocular transfer.

Authors:  L A Symons; P M Pearson; B Timney
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Visual motion aftereffects: differential adaptation and test stimulation.

Authors:  N J Wade; V Salvano-Pardieu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Motion aftereffect can be elicited from large spiral.

Authors:  A H Reinhardt-Rutland
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1987-06

6.  After-effects and the integration of patterns of neural activity within a channel.

Authors:  B Moulden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The role of intervening patterns in the storage of the movement aftereffect.

Authors:  P Thompson; J Wright
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  [Motion aftereffect in analysis of the visual system].

Authors:  D Heller; M Ziefle
Journal:  Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol       Date:  1993

9.  Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test.

Authors:  S Nishida; H Ashida; T Sato
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Velocity dependence of the interocular transfer of dynamic motion aftereffects.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Martin J M Lankheet; Wim A van de Grind; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.