Literature DB >> 17575904

Within-trial contrast: when is a failure to replicate not a type I error?

Thomas R Zentall1, Rebecca A Singer.   

Abstract

Vasconcelos, Urcuioli, and Lionello-DeNolf (2007) report the results of five experiments that fail to replicate the results of our within-trial contrast study (Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, & Zentall, 2000) and suggest that our results may represent a Type I Error. We believe that this conclusion is not warranted because (a) there is considerable evidence in support of the effect and (b) the amount of training that they gave to their pigeons prior to test may not have been sufficient to observe the effect reliably. We suggest that when sufficient training is provided, reliable contrast can be found.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17575904      PMCID: PMC1868582          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.04-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  "Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

Authors:  T S Clement; J R Feltus; D H Kaiser; T R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Second-order contrast based on the expectation of effort and reinforcement.

Authors:  Tricia S Clement; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-01

3.  Effect of response effort on the reward value of distinctively flavored food pellets.

Authors:  H L Armus
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2001-06

4.  Spontaneous alternation behavior.

Authors:  W N DEMBER; H FOWLER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons.

Authors:  Kelly A DiGian; Andrea M Friedrich; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

6.  On science and the discriminative law of effect.

Authors:  Michael Davison; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain.

Authors:  Andrea M Friedrich; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Contrast and the justification of effort.

Authors:  Emily D Klein; Ramesh S Bhatt; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

10.  "Justification of effort" in rats: effects of physical and discriminative effort on reward value.

Authors:  Jenny L Jellison
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2003-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Meagan K Gregory; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Melissa J Allman; Arthur E Wilke; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  When is a failure to replicate not a type II error?

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior at zero, fifty, and one hundred.

Authors:  A Charles Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Deprivation level and choice in pigeons: a test of within-trial contrast.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Extensive training is insufficient to produce the work-ethic effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Holly C Miller; Jérôme J D Alessandri; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.777

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.