Literature DB >> 15732699

Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons.

Kelly A DiGian1, Andrea M Friedrich, Thomas R Zentall.   

Abstract

Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, and Zentall (2000) reported that pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli that require greater effort (more pecks) to obtain over those that require less effort. In the present experiment, we examined two variables associated with this phenomenon. First, we asked whether delay of reinforcement, presumably a relatively aversive event similar to effort, would produce similar effects. Second, we asked whether the stimulus preference produced by a prior relatively aversive event depends on its anticipation. Anticipation of delay was accomplished by signaling its occurrence. Results indicated that delays can produce preferences similar to those produced by increased effort, but only if the delays are signaled.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15732699     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  "Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

Authors:  T S Clement; J R Feltus; D H Kaiser; T R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Second-order contrast based on the expectation of effort and reinforcement.

Authors:  Tricia S Clement; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-01

3.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Backward conditioning: a reevaluation of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  M L Spetch; D M Wilkie; J P Pinel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 17.737

  5 in total
  20 in total

1.  Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.

Authors:  Andrea M Friedrich; Tricia S Clement; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Within-trial contrast: when is a failure to replicate not a type I error?

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Deprivation level and choice in pigeons: a test of within-trial contrast.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Within-trial contrast: when you see it and when you don't.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: contrast or delay reduction?

Authors:  Rebecca A Singer; Laura M Berry; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Extensive training is insufficient to produce the work-ethic effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Holly C Miller; Jérôme J D Alessandri; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.