Literature DB >> 10767828

Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems.

A Rhodes1, B Jasani, D M Barnes, L G Bobrow, K D Miller.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate interlaboratory variance in the immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of oestrogen receptors so as to determine the rate of false negatives, which could adversely influence the decision to give adjuvant tamoxifen treatment.
METHODS: To ensure that similar results are obtained by different institutions, 200 laboratories from 26 countries have joined the UK national external quality assessment scheme for immunocytochemistry (NEQAS-ICC). Histological sections from breast cancers having low, medium, and high levels of oestrogen receptor expression were sent to each of the laboratories for immunohistochemical staining. The results obtained were evaluated for the sensitivity of detection, first by estimating threshold values of 1% and 10% of stained tumour cells, and second by the Quick score method, by a panel of four assessors judging individual sections independently on a single blind basis. The results were also evaluated using participants' own threshold values.
RESULTS: Over 80% of laboratories were able to demonstrate oestrogen receptor positivity on the medium and high expressing tumours, but only 37% of laboratories scored adequately on the low expressing tumour. Approximately one third of laboratories failed to register any positive staining in this tumour, while one third showed only minimal positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable interlaboratory variability, especially in relation to the detection of breast cancers with low oestrogen receptor positivity, with a false negative rate of between 30% and 60%. This variability appears to be caused by minor differences in methodology that may be rectified by fine adjustment of overall technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10767828      PMCID: PMC1763294          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.53.2.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  12 in total

Review 1.  Increased use of immunohistochemistry for oestrogen receptor measurement in mammary carcinoma: the need for quality assurance.

Authors:  D M Barnes; R R Millis; L V Beex; S M Thorpe; R E Leake
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Oestrogen receptors and breast cancer.

Authors:  R M Elledge; C K Osborne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-28

3.  Immunocytochemical localization of estrogen and progesterone receptor and prognosis in human primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Reiner; B Neumeister; J Spona; G Reiner; M Schemper; R Jakesz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies.

Authors:  K S McCarty; L S Miller; E B Cox; J Konrath; K S McCarty
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Estrogen receptor immunocytochemistry in paraffin embedded tissues with ER1D5 predicts breast cancer endocrine response more accurately than H222Sp gamma in frozen sections or cytosol-based ligand-binding assays.

Authors:  L P Pertschuk; J G Feldman; Y D Kim; L Braithwaite; F Schneider; A S Braverman; C Axiotis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Production of monoclonal antibodies to human estrogen-receptor protein (ER) using recombinant ER (RER).

Authors:  T al Saati; S Clamens; E Cohen-Knafo; J C Faye; H Prats; J M Coindre; J Wafflart; P Caverivière; F Bayard; G Delsol
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-10-21       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Comparison of two antibodies for evaluation of estrogen receptors in paraffin-embedded tumors.

Authors:  J B Hendricks; E J Wilkinson
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptors as a predictor of prognosis in breast cancer patients: comparison with quantitative biochemical methods.

Authors:  L B Kinsel; E Szabo; G L Greene; J Konrath; G S Leight; K S McCarty
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D M Barnes; W H Harris; P Smith; R R Millis; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  pS2 protein: a marker improving prediction of response to neoadjuvant tamoxifen in post-menopausal breast cancer patients.

Authors:  I Soubeyran; N Quénel; J M Coindre; F Bonichon; M Durand; J Wafflart; L Mauriac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  63 in total

1.  Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system.

Authors:  S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Breast cancer prognostication in the 21st century and the Nottingham prognostic index.

Authors:  T J Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  H Lee; A G Douglas-Jones; J M Morgan; B Jasani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Libero Santarpia; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Expression of PTTG1 and PTEN in endometrial carcinoma: correlation with tumorigenesis and progression.

Authors:  Zhen-Zhong Feng; Jia-Wei Chen; Zhao-Rui Yang; Guang-Zhong Lu; Zhao-Gen Cai
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program.

Authors:  Glenn D Francis; Margaret Dimech; Leanne Giles; Alison Hopkins
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Proficiency testing of immunohistochemical biomarker assays in breast cancer.

Authors:  Reinhard von Wasielewski; Svenja Hasselmann; Josef Rüschoff; Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Discordance in hormone receptor status among primary, metastatic, and second primary breast cancers: biological difference or misclassification?

Authors:  Dominique Sighoko; Juxin Liu; Ningqi Hou; Paul Gustafson; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.