Literature DB >> 20975745

Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Catherine Oakman1, Libero Santarpia, Angelo Di Leo.   

Abstract

Recommendation of systemic adjuvant therapy and choice of optimal agents for early-stage breast cancer remains a challenge. Adjuvant therapy is indicated on the assumption of residual micrometastatic disease. Adjuvant assessment tools for prognosis and prediction of treatment benefit, including Adjuvant! Online, the St Gallen Consensus, Oncotype DX(®) and MammaPrint(®), aid clinical decision making. However, all of these tools have limitations that must be considered in their judicious application. Clinicopathological based tools are critically dependent on accurate, standardized measurement of parameters. Multigene tools are appealing for their objectivity and reproducibility, particularly regarding analysis of proliferation, but these approaches still overlook the biological heterogeneity within tumors evidenced by distinct cell subpopulations with different genomic patterns and function. The greatest treatment challenge remains for patients assessed as intermediate risk of relapse, a problem not overcome by multigene tools. Remarkable diversity in breast cancer dictates that adjuvant management must be biologically driven. Future identification of predictive biomarkers for specific chemotherapy sensitivity may allow targeted use of available agents, including anthracyclines, taxanes and DNA damaging agents. The presence of drug targets and targetable signaling pathways, rather than molecularly defined subgroups, may ultimately drive treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20975745     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  60 in total

1.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas.

Authors:  M F Press; L Bernstein; P A Thomas; L F Meisner; J Y Zhou; Y Ma; G Hung; R A Robinson; C Harris; A El-Naggar; D J Slamon; R N Phillips; J S Ross; S R Wolman; K J Flom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Standardizing slide-based assays in breast cancer: hormone receptors, HER2, and sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: correlation of standards achieved on in house tumours with that achieved on external quality assessment material in over 150 laboratories from 26 countries.

Authors:  A Rhodes; B Jasani; A J Balaton; K D Miller
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; I Craig Henderson; Marc L Citron; Daniel R Budman; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; Edith A Perez; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2/neu in breast cancer--a rare event.

Authors:  Wedad Hanna; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Harriette J Kahn
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Increased expression of BRCA1 mRNA predicts favorable response to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in breast cancers.

Authors:  Chiyomi Egawa; Kazuyoshi Motomura; Yasuo Miyoshi; Yuuki Takamura; Tetsuya Taguchi; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Hideo Inaji; Hiroki Koyama; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  C Liedtke; K Broglio; S Moulder; L Hsu; S-W Kau; W F Symmans; C Albarracin; F Meric-Bernstam; W Woodward; R L Theriault; L Kiesel; G N Hortobagyi; L Pusztai; A M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marieke E Straver; Annuska M Glas; Juliane Hannemann; Jelle Wesseling; Marc J van de Vijver; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Harm van Tinteren; Laura J Van't Veer; Sjoerd Rodenhuis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Rodenhuis; I A M Mandjes; J Wesseling; M J van de Vijver; M-J T D F Vrancken Peeters; G S Sonke; S C Linn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  HER2-positive circulating tumor cells indicate poor clinical outcome in stage I to III breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Pia Wülfing; Julia Borchard; Horst Buerger; Stefan Heidl; Kurt S Zänker; Ludwig Kiesel; Burkhard Brandt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  41 in total

1.  Translating cancer 'omics' to improved outcomes.

Authors:  Emily A Vucic; Kelsie L Thu; Keith Robison; Leszek A Rybaczyk; Raj Chari; Carlos E Alvarez; Wan L Lam
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Propensity score analysis of the prognostic value of genomic assays for breast cancer in diverse populations using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Abiola Ibraheem; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Biomarkers and sustainable innovation in cardiovascular drug development: lessons from near and far afield.

Authors:  Russell M Medford; T Forcht Dagi; Robert S Rosenson; Margaret K Offermann
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Breast cancer therapy planning - a novel support concept for a sequential decision making problem.

Authors:  Alexander Scherrer; Ilka Schwidde; Andreas Dinges; Patrick Rüdiger; Sherko Kümmel; Karl-Heinz Küfer
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 5.  The recurrent architecture of tumour initiation, progression and drug sensitivity.

Authors:  Andrea Califano; Mariano J Alvarez
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Can some patients avoid adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer?

Authors:  Philippe L Bedard; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Insight into the heterogeneity of breast cancer through next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Hege G Russnes; Nicholas Navin; James Hicks; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  The pyrido[b]indole MDM2 inhibitor SP-141 exerts potent therapeutic effects in breast cancer models.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jiang-Jiang Qin; Sukesh Voruganti; Kalkunte S Srivenugopal; Subhasree Nag; Shivaputra Patil; Horrick Sharma; Ming-Hai Wang; Hui Wang; John K Buolamwini; Ruiwen Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Are there biologic differences between male and female breast cancer explaining inferior outcome of men despite equal stage and treatment?!

Authors:  A-C Müller; C Gani; H M E Rehm; F Eckert; M Bamberg; T Hehr; M Weinmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Serum VEGF-A and Tumor Vessel VEGFR-2 Levels Predict Survival in Caucasian but Not Asian Patients Undergoing Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Do Joong Park; An Na Seo; Changhwan Yoon; Geoffrey Y Ku; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong; Yun-Suhk Suh; Hye Seung Lee; Han-Kwang Yang; Hyung-Ho Kim; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.