Literature DB >> 18958494

Proficiency testing of immunohistochemical biomarker assays in breast cancer.

Reinhard von Wasielewski1, Svenja Hasselmann, Josef Rüschoff, Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff, Hans Kreipe.   

Abstract

Steroid hormone receptor expression and HER2 status have become an integral part of histopathologic characterization of breast cancer and corresponding biomarker assays have gained important prognostic and predictive impact. Because testing inaccuracy could provide a major hazard to modern breast cancer therapy, a laboratory proficiency testing program has been implemented in Germany using tissue microarrays (TMAs). In four consecutive annual trials with 142 laboratories participating on average per trial, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) were determined immunohistochemically by participating laboratories followed by central review of all immunostains. Performance strongly depended on the ambiguity of expression of the target molecule in the test samples. In clearly positive (Allred score 7-8; Her2 3+) or negative tissue samples, the majority of participants (86%) achieved concordance rates exceeding 85%. By contrast, low expression of ER or PR (Allred score 3-4) as well as Her2 status 2+ led to considerable lower concordance rates ranging from 41% (Her2 2+) to 75% (PR). Poor reproducibility was predominantly due to inadequate laboratory performance whereas interobserver agreement (weighted kappa statistics) usually was high (>0.81). Laboratories that participated in more than one of the four subsequent trials (n = 110) showed a highly significant improvement of performance. In conclusion, a TMA-based proficiency testing of biomarkers in breast cancer has been implemented in Germany over a 5-year period and revealed reliable assessment of unambiguously positive and negative test samples. Low-expressing tumor samples with regard to steroid hormone receptor expression and Her2 status 2+ led to inaccurate evaluations by up to 59% of participants. Regularly participating laboratories showed a significant improvement of performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18958494     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-008-0688-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  17 in total

1.  Interlaboratory variation in results from immunohistochemical assessment of estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Lester J Layfield; Neal Goldstein; Kathryn R Perkinson; Alan D Proia
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 2.  Quantification of immunohistochemistry--issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment II.

Authors:  C R Taylor; R M Levenson
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Johnny Raffoul; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Stephen Braye; Christian Ohlschlegel; Beat Thürlimann; Richard D Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry A Gusterson; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Beneath the surface of the mud, part II: the dichotomization of continuous biologicvariables by maximizing immunohistochemical method sensitivity.

Authors:  Paul E Swanson; Rodney A Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Standardizing slide-based assays in breast cancer: hormone receptors, HER2, and sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Tissue array technology for testing interlaboratory and interobserver reproducibility of immunohistochemical estrogen receptor analysis in a large multicenter trial.

Authors:  Reinhard von Wasielewski; Michael Mengel; Birgitt Wiese; Thomas Rüdiger; Hans Konrad Müller-Hermelink; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Interlaboratory comparison of immunohistochemical testing for HER2: results of the 2004 and 2005 College of American Pathologists HER2 Immunohistochemistry Tissue Microarray Survey.

Authors:  Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Douglas A Murphy; David M Dorfman; Patrick C Roche; Raymond R Tubbs
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Consistency of staining and reporting of oestrogen receptor immunocytochemistry within the European Union--an inter-laboratory study.

Authors:  C A Wells; J P Sloane; D Coleman; C Munt; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; W Boecker; G Bussolati; C E Connolly; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; I O Ellis; C W Elston; V Eusebi; D Faverly; P Heikkila; R Holland; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; J L Peterse; F Rank; A Reiner; E Saksela; B Sigal-Zafrani; M Sylvan; B Borisch; G Cserni; T Decker; H Kerner; J Kulka; P Regitnig; A Sapino; A M Tanous; S Thorstenson; E Zozaya
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  25 in total

1.  Molecular profiling of individual tumor cells by hyperspectral microscopic imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan W Uhr; Michael L Huebschman; Eugene P Frenkel; Nancy L Lane; Raheela Ashfaq; Huaying Liu; Dipen R Rana; Lawrence Cheng; Alice T Lin; Gareth A Hughes; Xiaojing J Zhang; Harold R Garner
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 7.012

2.  Tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical determination of oncological biomarkers.

Authors:  Paolo Verderio; Antonino Carbone
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Pathologists' Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  [Interlaboratory trials for quality assurance of breast cancer biomarkers in Germany].

Authors:  C A Krusche; R von Wasielewski; J Rüschoff; A Fisseler-Eckhoff; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  [Receptor detection in breast cancer. A decade of quality assurance trials in German-speaking pathology].

Authors:  H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 6.  Clinical potential of mass spectrometry-based proteogenomics.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey S Baird; Karin D Rodland; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Banff Initiative for Quality Assurance in Transplantation (BIFQUIT): reproducibility of polyomavirus immunohistochemistry in kidney allografts.

Authors:  B Adam; P Randhawa; S Chan; G Zeng; H Regele; Y B Kushner; R B Colvin; J Reeve; M Mengel
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 8.  [Translational research and diagnostics for breast cancer].

Authors:  H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  [ErbB2 diagnostics in breast cancer--an update].

Authors:  J Rüschoff; I Nagelmeier; M Hofmann; Th Henkel; O Stoss
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Confirmation of a low HER2 positivity rate of breast carcinomas - limitations of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Ulrich F Vogel
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.