Literature DB >> 11864999

Breast cancer prognostication in the 21st century and the Nottingham prognostic index.

T J Anderson.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 11864999      PMCID： PMC1769594          DOI： 10.1136/jcp.55.2.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN： 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Histopathological workup of sentinel lymph nodes: how much is enough?

Authors:  P J van Diest
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference.

Authors:  J W Yarbro; D L Page; L P Fielding; E E Partridge; G P Murphy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Reproducibility of mitosis counting in 2,469 breast cancer specimens: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project.

Authors:  P J van Diest; J P Baak; P Matze-Cok; E C Wisse-Brekelmans; C M van Galen; P H Kurver; S M Bellot; J Fijnheer; L H van Gorp; W S Kwee
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189.

Authors:  J F Simpson; R Gray; L G Dressler; C D Cobau; C I Falkson; K W Gilchrist; K J Pandya; D L Page; N J Robert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Long term prognostic value of Nottingham histological grade and its components in early (pT1N0M0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S Frkovic-Grazio; M Bracko
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Histologic grading in breast cancer--reproducibility between seven pathologic departments. South Sweden Breast Cancer Group.

Authors:  P Boiesen; P O Bendahl; L Anagnostaki; H Domanski; E Holm; I Idvall; S Johansson; O Ljungberg; A Ringberg; G Ostberg; M Fernö
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Problems in defining cutoff points of continuous prognostic factors: example of tumor thickness in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  P Buettner; C Garbe; I Guggenmoos-Holzmann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems.

Authors:  A Rhodes; B Jasani; D M Barnes; L G Bobrow; K D Miller
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Implications of pathologist concordance for breast cancer assessments in mammography screening from age 40 years.

Authors:  Thomas J Anderson; Farzana Sufi; Ian O Ellis; John P Sloane; Susan Moss
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Consistency of histopathological reporting of breast lesions detected by screening: findings of the U.K. National External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme. U. K. National Coordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology.

Authors:  J P Sloane; R Ellman; T J Anderson; C L Brown; J Coyne; N S Dallimore; J D Davies; D Eakins; I O Ellis; C W Elston
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162
View more
  2 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical prognostic index for breast cancer in young women.

Authors:  I Guerra; J Algorta; R Díaz de Otazu; A Pelayo; J Fariña
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-12

2.  Relationship between Clinicopathologic Variables in Breast Cancer Overall Survival Using Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm.

Authors:  Li-Yeh Chuang; Guang-Yu Chen; Sin-Hua Moi; Fu Ou-Yang; Ming-Feng Hou; Cheng-Hong Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.411
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.