Literature DB >> 10748437

Time-course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise.

D A Hall1, A Q Summerfield, M S Gonçalves, J R Foster, A R Palmer, R W Bowtell.   

Abstract

It is a concern for auditory fMRI studies that acoustic noise generated by the scanner produces an auditory response that can confound stimulus-induced activation. To establish how to minimize this problem, the present study mapped the time-course of the auditory response to a burst of acoustic scanner noise by employing a single-event method. Recorded bursts of scanner noise were interspersed with clustered-volume acquisitions at a range of stimulus-to-imaging delays to map the response with a temporal resolution of 1 sec. There were strong responses (1.5% signal change) to scanner noise in primary and secondary auditory cortex. In both cortical areas, the mean response rose to a peak by 4-5 sec after stimulus onset and decayed after a further 5-8 sec. The time course indicates that noise contamination in auditory fMRI can be substantially reduced by using a 9-12-sec repetition time, thus maximizing the dynamic range available for displaying the response to acoustical stimuli of interest.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10748437     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(200004)43:4<601::aid-mrm16>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  25 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; Jennifer R Melcher; Barbara C Fullerton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Characterizing response to elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Are you listening? Brain activation associated with sustained nonspatial auditory attention in the presence and absence of stimulation.

Authors:  Anna Seydell-Greenwald; Adam S Greenberg; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Resting in peace or noise: scanner background noise suppresses default-mode network.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.