Literature DB >> 10723205

Speech perception without hearing.

L E Bernstein1, M E Demorest, P E Tucker.   

Abstract

In this study of visual phonetic speech perception without accompanying auditory speech stimuli, adults with normal hearing (NH; n = 96) and with severely to profoundly impaired hearing (IH; n = 72) identified consonant-vowel (CV) nonsense syllables and words in isolation and in sentences. The measures of phonetic perception were the proportion of phonemes correct and the proportion of transmitted feature information for CVs, the proportion of phonemes correct for words, and the proportion of phonemes correct and the amount of phoneme substitution entropy for sentences. The results demonstrated greater sensitivity to phonetic information in the IH group. Transmitted feature information was related to isolated word scores for the IH group, but not for the NH group. Phoneme errors in sentences were more systematic in the IH than in the NH group. Individual differences in phonetic perception for CVs were more highly associated with word and sentence performance for the IH than for the NH group. The results suggest that the necessity to perceive speech without hearing can be associated with enhanced visual phonetic perception in some individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10723205     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  60 in total

1.  Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.

Authors:  L Lachs; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Authors:  Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick; Brian French; Chad Gotch; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nancy Young
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

5.  Specification of cross-modal source information in isolated kinematic displays of speech.

Authors:  Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The perception of visible speech: estimation of speech rate and detection of time reversals.

Authors:  Paolo Viviani; Francesca Figliozzi; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jacqueline Leybaert; Carol J LaSasso
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

8.  Cross-modal prediction in speech depends on prior linguistic experience.

Authors:  Carolina Sánchez-García; James T Enns; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Audio-visual perception of sinewave speech in an adult cochlear implant user: a case study.

Authors:  W D Goh; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk; R E Remez
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Spoken word recognition by eye.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.