Literature DB >> 12120798

The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness.

Edward T Auer1.   

Abstract

The neighborhood activation model (NAM; P. A. Luce & Pisoni, 1998) of spoken word recognition was applied to the problem of predicting accuracy of visual spoken word identification. One hundred fifty-three spoken consonant-vowel-consonant words were identified by a group of 12 college-educated adults with normal hearing and a group of 12 college-educated deaf adults. In both groups, item identification accuracy was correlated with the computed NAM output values. Analysis of subsets of the stimulus set demonstrated that when stimulus intelligibility was controlled, words with fewer neighbors were easier to identify than words with many neighbors. However, when neighborhood density was controlled, variation in segmental intelligibility was minimally related to identification accuracy. The present study provides evidence of a common spoken word recognition system for both auditory and visual speech that retains sensitivity to the phonetic properties of the input.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12120798     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.

Authors:  P A Luce; S D Goldinger; E T Auer; M S Vitevitch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

2.  Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

3.  The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon.

Authors:  A Lahiri; W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-03

4.  Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness.

Authors:  E T Auer; L E Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Confusions among visually perceived consonants.

Authors:  C G Fisher
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1968-12

8.  Guessing and speechreading.

Authors:  B Lyxell; J Rönnberg
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1987-02

9.  Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers.

Authors:  E Owens; B Blazek
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  20 in total

1.  Specification of cross-modal source information in isolated kinematic displays of speech.

Authors:  Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Response Errors in Females' and Males' Sentence Lipreading Necessitate Structurally Different Models for Predicting Lipreading Accuracy.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2018-02-26

Review 5.  Investigating speechreading and deafness.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  There Goes the Neighborhood: Lipreading and the Structure of the Mental Lexicon.

Authors:  Julia Feld; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Avanti Dey; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-29

9.  Spoken word recognition by eye.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

10.  Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Xiang Zhou; Lars A Ross; John J Foxe; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.