Literature DB >> 22644263

Surrogate decision-making in Korean patients with advanced cancer: a longitudinal study.

June Koo Lee1, Bhumsuk Keam, Ah Reum An, Tae Min Kim, Se-Hoon Lee, Dong-Wan Kim, Dae Seog Heo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although surrogate decision-making in cancer patients is well-known, few studies investigating the prevalence of surrogate decision-making over time have been reported. The objectives of this study were to investigate the level of surrogate decision-making in advanced cancer patients over time and the impact of demographic and clinical variables on surrogate decision-making.
METHODS: The level of surrogate decision-making was measured in 572 consecutive cancer patients who died between January 1 and December 31, 2009. We reviewed 8,639 informed consent forms of these patients, calculated the proportion of decisions made by a surrogate (PDS) for each patient, and analyzed the association of PDS with demographic and clinical variables.
RESULTS: Surrogates completed 40.3 % of all consent forms. The prevalence of surrogate decision-making was higher in the end-of-life period (death <7 days, OR = 29.05; reference, >365 days). Surrogates signed consent forms more frequently for do-not-resuscitate directives, intensive care unit admission, emergency hemodialysis, surgery and invasive interventions compared with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and diagnostic tests (OR = 3.88, P < 0.001). Patients of older age (P = 0.036) and those with a shorter duration of management (P < 0.001) were independently associated with greater PDS.
CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate decision-making was frequently observed among Korean cancer patients in this study, especially when the patient's death was imminent, and for decisions related to end-of-life care. Surrogates were also frequently involved in decisions for elderly or rapidly deteriorating patients. Healthcare professionals should consider the significant role of familial surrogates in the end-of-life period; comprehensive approaches are needed to preserve the best interest of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644263     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1509-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  45 in total

1.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients: a single center's experience.

Authors:  Do-Youn Oh; Jee-Hyun Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang; Noe Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) paradigm to improve end-of-life care: potential state legal barriers to implementation.

Authors:  Susan E Hickman; Charles P Sabatino; Alvin H Moss; Jessica Wehrle Nester
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 4.  The promise of a good death.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Perceptions of older people with cancer of information, decision making and treatment: a systematic review of selected literature.

Authors:  Z Chouliara; N Kearney; D Stott; A Molassiotis; M Miller
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  The do-not-resuscitate order. Still too little too late.

Authors:  K Gleeson; S Wise
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-05

8.  Quality of end-of-life treatment for cancer patients in general wards and the palliative care unit at a regional cancer center in Japan: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Kazuki Sato; Mitsunori Miyashita; Tatsuya Morita; Makiko Sanjo; Yasuo Shima; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Dissociation between the wishes of terminally ill parents and decisions by their offspring.

Authors:  M Sonnenblick; Y Friedlander; A Steinberg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study.

Authors:  Agnes van der Heide; Luc Deliens; Karin Faisst; Tore Nilstun; Michael Norup; Eugenio Paci; Gerrit van der Wal; Paul J van der Maas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Do-not-resuscitate consent signed by patients indicates a more favorable quality of end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Hsin Liang; Chih-Hsin Wei; Wen-Hui Hsu; Yu-Yun Shao; Ya-Chin Lin; Pei-Chun Chou; Ann-Lii Cheng; Kun-Huei Yeh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The impact of caregiver's role preference on decisional conflicts and psychiatric distresses in decision making to help caregiver's disclosure of terminal disease status.

Authors:  Shin Hye Yoo; Young Ho Yun; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Jung Lim Lee; Jeanno Park; Youn Seon Choi; Yeun Keun Lim; Samyong Kim; Hyun Sik Jeong; Jung Hun Kang; Ho-Suk Oh; Ji Chan Park; Si-Young Kim; Hong Suk Song; Keun Seok Lee; Dae Seog Heo; Young Seon Hong
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Ethics in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Jae Young Moon; Ju-Ock Kim
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2015-06-30

4.  Insights into Chinese perspectives on do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders from an examination of DNR order form completeness for cancer patients.

Authors:  Kuei-Yen Wen; Ya-Chin Lin; Ju-Feng Cheng; Pei-Chun Chou; Chih-Hsin Wei; Yun-Fang Chen; Jia-Ling Sun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The Association between End-of-Life Care and the Time Interval between Provision of a Do-Not-Resuscitate Consent and Death in Cancer Patients in Korea.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Baek; Hye Jung Chang; Ja Min Byun; Jae Joon Han; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.679

6.  Feasibility Study of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients with Terminal Cancer.

Authors:  Ho Jung An; Hyun Jeong Jeon; Sang Hoon Chun; Hyun Ae Jung; Hee Kyung Ahn; Kyung Hee Lee; Min-Ho Kim; Ju Hee Kim; Jaekyung Cheon; JinShil Kim; Su-Jin Koh
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  A National Study of Life-Sustaining Treatments in South Korea: What Factors Affect Decision-Making?

Authors:  So-Youn Park; Bomyee Lee; Jeong Yeon Seon; In-Hwan Oh
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Life-sustaining medical treatment for terminal patients in Korea.

Authors:  Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients.

Authors:  Jung Sun Kim; Shin Hye Yoo; Wonho Choi; Yejin Kim; Jinui Hong; Min Sun Kim; Hye Yoon Park; Bhumsuk Keam; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  The Situation of Life-Sustaining Treatment One Year after Enforcement of the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life in Korea: Data of National Agency for Management of Life-Sustaining Treatment.

Authors:  Ha Yeon Lee; Hwa Jung Kim; Jung Hye Kwon; Sun Kyung Baek; Young-Woong Won; Yu Jung Kim; Su Jin Baik; Hyewon Ryu
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.679

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.