Literature DB >> 10708169

Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients.

A Bur1, M M Hirschl, H Herkner, E Oschatz, J Kofler, C Woisetschläger, A N Laggner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective data collection.
SETTING: Emergency department in a 2,000-bed inner city hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight patients categorized into three groups according to their upper-arm circumference (group I: 18-25 cm; group II: 25.1-33 cm; and group III: 33.1-47.5 cm) were enrolled in the study protocol.
INTERVENTIONS: In each patient, all three cuff sizes (Hewlett-Packard Cuff 40401 B, C, and D) were used to perform an oscillometric blood pressure measurement at least within 3 mins until ten to 20 measurements for each cuff size were achieved. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure measurement was done by cannulation of the contralateral radial artery with direct transduction of the systemic arterial pressure waveform. The corresponding invasive blood pressure value was obtained at the end of each oscillometric measurement. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN
RESULTS: Overall, 1,494 pairs of simultaneous oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements were collected in 38 patients (group I, n = 5; group II, n = 23; and group III, n = 10) over a total time of 72.3 hrs. Mean arterial blood pressure ranged from 35 to 165 mm Hg. The overall discrepancy between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurement was -6.7+/-9.7 mm Hg (p<.0001), if the recommended cuff size according to the upper-arm circumference was used (539 measurements). Of all the blood pressure measurements, 26.4% (n = 395) had a discrepancy of > or =10 mm Hg and 34.2% (n = 512) exhibited a discrepancy of > or =20 mm Hg. No differences between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements were noted in patients either with or without inotropic support (-6.6 + 7.2 vs. -8.6 + 6.8 mm Hg; not significant).
CONCLUSION: The oscillometric blood pressure measurement significantly underestimates arterial blood pressure and exhibits a high number of measurements out of the clinically acceptable range. The relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference contributes substantially to the inaccuracy of the oscillometric blood pressure measurement. Therefore, oscillometric blood pressure measurement does not achieve adequate accuracy in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708169     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  22 in total

1.  The mean prehospital machine; accurate prehospital non-invasive blood pressure measurement in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Sandy Muecke; Andrew Bersten; John Plummer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Noninvasive continuous beat-to-beat radial artery pressure via TL-200 applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Ron Dueck; Oliver Goedje; Paul Clopton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Innovative continuous non-invasive cuffless blood pressure monitoring based on photoplethysmography technology.

Authors:  Juan C Ruiz-Rodríguez; Adolf Ruiz-Sanmartín; Vicent Ribas; Jesús Caballero; Alejandra García-Roche; Jordi Riera; Xavier Nuvials; Miriam de Nadal; Oriol de Sola-Morales; Joaquim Serra; Jordi Rello
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management.

Authors:  Guo Chen; Elena Chung; Lingzhong Meng; Brenton Alexander; Trung Vu; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Validation of arterial blood pressures observed from the patient monitor; a tool for prehospital research.

Authors:  Sandy Muecke; Andrew Bersten; John Plummer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Evaluation and management of elevated blood pressures in hospitalized children.

Authors:  Abanti Chaudhuri; Scott M Sutherland
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 7.  Therapeutic hypertension: principles and methods.

Authors:  David J Powner; Joseph M Darby; John W Crommett; Robert L Levine
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Variation of arterial and central venous catheter use in United States intensive care units.

Authors:  Hayley B Gershengorn; Allan Garland; Andrew Kramer; Damon C Scales; Gordon Rubenfeld; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  A comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurement on the wrist with invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Helmut Hager; Goutham Mandadi; Debra Pulley; J Chris Eagon; Edward Mascha; Benjamin Nutter; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  The mean machine; accurate non-invasive blood pressure measurement in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Sandy Muecke; Andrew Bersten; John Plummer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.