Literature DB >> 22382920

Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management.

Guo Chen1, Elena Chung, Lingzhong Meng, Brenton Alexander, Trung Vu, Joseph Rinehart, Maxime Cannesson.   

Abstract

The Nexfin device allows for non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring (BP(NXF)). Perioperative hypotension and hypertension have been shown to be associated with poor clinical outcomes. The goal of the present study was to assess the ability of this device to decrease the duration of significant intraoperative hypo- or hypertension compared to standard BP monitoring by cuff (BP(CUFF)). We studied25 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing either abdominal or orthopedic surgery. BP(CUFF) was monitored every 5 min from the introduction of anesthesia, while BP(NXF) was monitored continuously on the opposite arm. When systolic BP(NXF) (SBP(NXF)) decreased or increased more than 20% relative to baseline SBP(NXF), a standard BP(CUFF) measurement was taken to compare values. In addition, the time interval between the 20% change in SBP(NXF) and the next scheduled standard SBP(CUFF) measurement was recorded for each event. The mean length of surgery was 3.0 ± 0.3 h. Patients presented with 11 ± 4 episodes of hypotension and 12 ± 4 episodes of hypertension during the surgery. If BP(CUFF) had been used, this would have resulted in 21 ± 7 min of hypotension and 20 ± 10 min of hypertension. If hemodynamic changes seen by SBP(NXF) were appropriately treated, an average of 7 ± 1 min/h of hypotension time, 7 ± 2 min/h of hypertension time and 14 ± 3 min per hour of hypo- or hypertension time may have been identified. The Nexfin BP has the potential to decrease the time of hypotension and hypertension compared to conventional intermittent BP(CUFF) monitoring. Therefore, this device has the potential to positively impact clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22382920     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9344-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  46 in total

1.  Reconstruction of brachial pressure from finger arterial pressure during orthostasis.

Authors:  Lysander W J Bogert; Mark P M Harms; Frank Pott; Niels H Secher; Karel H Wesseling; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 2.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Intraoperative systolic blood pressure variability predicts 30-day mortality in aortocoronary bypass surgery patients.

Authors:  Solomon Aronson; Mark Stafford-Smith; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Andrew Shaw; Jeffrey Gaca; Mark Newman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Closed-loop systems for drug delivery.

Authors:  Aaron M Fields; Kevin M Fields; Jeremy W Cannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 5.  Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.

Authors:  M K Park; S W Menard; C Yuan
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-01

7.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring of tachycardic episodes during interventional electrophysiology.

Authors:  Roberto Maggi; Valentina Viscardi; Toshiyuki Furukawa; Michele Brignole
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 8.  Exploring an optimum intra/postoperative management strategy for acute hypertension in the cardiac surgery patient.

Authors:  Albert T Cheung
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.620

9.  Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery.

Authors:  Tong J Gan; Andrew Soppitt; Mohamed Maroof; Habib el-Moalem; Kerri M Robertson; Eugene Moretti; Peter Dwane; Peter S A Glass
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients.

Authors:  John F Stover; Reto Stocker; Renato Lenherr; Thomas A Neff; Silvia R Cottini; Bernhard Zoller; Markus Béchir
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.217

View more
  17 in total

1.  The future of intraoperative blood pressure management.

Authors:  Frederic Michard; Ngai Liu; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring: a review of current applications.

Authors:  Elena Chung; Guo Chen; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Continuous non-invasive monitoring improves blood pressure stability in upright position: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Benes; Alena Simanova; Tereza Tovarnicka; Silvie Sevcikova; Jakub Kletecka; Jan Zatloukal; Richard Pradl; Ivan Chytra; Eduard Kasal
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Impact of non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring on maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Aya Kimura; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Impact of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on hemodynamic fluctuation during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Aya Kimura; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Noninvasive Monitoring and Potential for Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Susana Vacas; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 7.  Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Jasper Truijen; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wilbert A Wesselink; Berend E Westerhof
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study.

Authors:  Azim N Laiwalla; Yinn Cher Ooi; Barbara Van De Wiele; Keren Ziv; Adam Brown; Raymond Liou; Jeffrey L Saver; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Non-invasive assessment of cardiac hemodynamics in patients with advanced cancer and with chronic heart failure: a pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephan von Haehling; Mitja Lainscak; Thomas Kung; Larissa Cramer; Susann Fülster; Uwe Pelzer; Bert Hildebrandt; Anja Sandek; Joerg C Schefold; Mathias Rauchhaus; Wolfram Doehner; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Perioperative hemodynamic optimization using the photoplethysmography in colorectal surgery (the PANEX3 trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Fischer; Anne-Lise Fiant; Mariam Boutros; Frédéric Flais; Tzetan Filipov; Stéphane Debroczi; Léa Pasqualini; Toufiq Rhanem; Jean-Louis Gérard; Lydia Guittet; Jean-Luc Hanouz; Arnaud Alves; Jean-Jacques Parienti
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.