Literature DB >> 10693903

Lessons learned from enrollment in the BEST study--a multicenter, randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer.

P J Goodwin1, M Leszcz, G Quirt, J Koopmans, A Arnold, E Dohan, M Hundleby, H M Chochinov, M Navarro.   

Abstract

The BEST study, a multicenter randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer, had several unusual features that may have influenced recruitment, notably the group nature of the intervention and the need for close collaboration between medical and psychosocial investigators. The recruitment process was examined in light of these features. Establishment of study centers was facilitated by involvement of experienced medical investigators who had successfully collaborated in previous research projects. Systematic evaluation of potential subjects or direct recruitment by psychosocial investigators optimized recruitment; however, the group nature of the intervention prolonged recruitment. Overall, 652 women were approached and 237 (43.3% of those medically eligible) randomized. Using population-based estimates, 24.3% of women with metastatic breast cancer were assessed for the study and 8.7% randomized. A randomization ratio of 2:1 was required to form and maintain groups. Competing clinical trials were the greatest barrier to recruitment. Five lessons were learned during recruitment for this trial: (1) multicenter randomized trials of psychosocial interventions are feasible, even in very ill patients, (2) the use of a group intervention effectively increased the required sample size by 50%, (3) similarity of randomization rates suggests that generalizability of study results will probably be comparable to that of other randomized cancer trials, (4) multidisciplinary collaborations and involvement of experienced researchers facilitated enrollment, and (5) most challenges encountered in recruitment were similar to those seen in all clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693903     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00148-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  10 in total

Review 1.  Characteristics and methodological quality of 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; Stephanie J Sohl; Sarah K Knapp-Oliver; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  Feasibility of Coping Effectiveness Training for Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Genetic Counseling Intervention.

Authors:  Christy Haakonsen Smith; Erin Turbitt; John Muschelli; Lori Leonard; Katie L Lewis; Brian Freedman; Michelle Muratori; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Federico Puma; Bassam Dahman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Development and Implementation of a Psychological Service for Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Miryam Yusufov; Lawrence Grebstein; Joseph S Rossi; Colleen A Redding; Ginette G Ferszt; James O Prochaska
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2020-06-06

5.  Accrual and retention of diverse patients in psychosocial cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Grace Ann Hanvey; Adaixa Padron; Elizabeth L Kacel; Gabriel Cartagena; Kelsey C Bacharz; Christina S McCrae; Michael E Robinson; Lori B Waxenberg; Michael H Antoni; Richard B Berry; Gregory S Schultz; Jacqueline Castagno; Deidre B Pereira
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  Responding to a significant recruitment challenge within three nationwide psychoeducational trials for cancer patients.

Authors:  Annette L Stanton; Marion E Morra; Michael A Diefenbach; Suzanne M Miller; Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia; Peter C Raich; Linda Fleisher; Kuang-Yi Wen; Zung Vu Tran; Nihal E Mohamed; Roshini George; Mary Anne Bright; Alfred C Marcus
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 7.  Lessons to be learned from 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; Sarah K Knapp-Oliver; Stephanie J Sohl; Stefan Schnieder; Anna H L Floyd
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

8.  Advancing the evidence base in cancer: psychosocial multicenter trials.

Authors:  Robert Sanson-Fisher; Lisa Mackenzie; Phyllis Butow; Nicole Rankin; Christine Paul
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Effectiveness of palliative care interventions offering social support to people with life-limiting illness-A systematic review.

Authors:  N Bradley; M Lloyd-Williams; C Dowrick
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  Online, Group-Based Psychological Support for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Results from the Recapture Life Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Claire E Wakefield; Sarah J Ellis; Brittany C McGill; Mark W Donoghoe; Phyllis Butow; Richard A Bryant; Susan M Sawyer; Pandora Patterson; Antoinette Anazodo; Megan Plaster; Kate Thompson; Lucy Holland; Michael Osborn; Fiona Maguire; Catherine O'Dwyer; Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.