Literature DB >> 19264411

Characteristics and methodological quality of 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.

Anne Moyer1, Stephanie J Sohl, Sarah K Knapp-Oliver, Stefan Schneider.   

Abstract

The considerable amount of research examining psychosocial interventions for cancer patients makes it important to examine its scope and methodological quality. This comprehensive overview characterizes the field with as few exclusions as possible. A systematic search strategy identified 673 reports comprising 488 unique projects conducted over a 25 year time span. Although the literature on this topic has grown over time, the research was predominantly conducted in the United States (57.0%), largely with breast cancer patients (included in 70.5% of the studies). The intervention approach used most frequently was cognitive behavioral (32.4%), the treatment goal was often improving quality of life generally (69.5%), and the professionals delivering the interventions were typically nurses (29.1%) or psychologists (22.7%). Overall, there was some discrepancy between the types of interventions studied and the types of supportive services available to and sought by cancer patients. Strengths of this research include using randomized designs (62.9%), testing for baseline group equivalence (84.5%), and monitoring treatment, which rose significantly from being used in 48.1-64.4% of projects over time. However, deficiencies in such areas as examining treatment mechanisms and the adequacy of reporting of methodology, essential for useful syntheses of research on these interventions, remain to be addressed. Methodological challenges related to the complexity of this applied research, such as participants seeking treatment outside of research, contamination, and reactions to randomization, also were apparent. Future research could benefit from closer interactions between academic and voluntary sectors and expanding the diversity of participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19264411      PMCID: PMC2746199          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  81 in total

Review 1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  More may not be better in psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  J C Coyne; A Kagee
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 3.  Biobehavioral outcomes following psychological interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

Review 4.  A systematic review of guided imagery as an adjuvant cancer therapy.

Authors:  Liz Roffe; Katja Schmidt; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Lessons learned from enrollment in the BEST study--a multicenter, randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  P J Goodwin; M Leszcz; G Quirt; J Koopmans; A Arnold; E Dohan; M Hundleby; H M Chochinov; M Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  An intervention to increase quality of life and self-care self-efficacy and decrease symptoms in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  E L Lev; K M Daley; N E Conner; M Reith; C Fernandez; S V Owen
Journal:  Sch Inq Nurs Pract       Date:  2001

7.  Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies.

Authors:  Barbara Rehse; Ralf Pukrop
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-06

Review 8.  Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Meta-analysis of the effects of psychosocial interventions on survival time in cancer patients.

Authors:  Geir Smedslund; Gerd Inger Ringdal
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness.

Authors:  Morton A Lieberman; Mitch Golant; Janine Giese-Davis; Andy Winzlenberg; Harold Benjamin; Keith Humphreys; Carol Kronenwetter; Stefani Russo; David Spiegel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Mediators of change in psychosocial interventions for cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; Matthew Goldenberg; Matthew A Hall; Sarah K Knapp-Oliver; Stephanie J Sohl; Elizabeth A Sarma; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.104

2.  Toward a cancer-specific model of psychological distress: population data from the 2003-2005 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  Natalie C Kaiser; Narineh Hartoonian; Jason E Owen
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Decreased Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios with Increased Accessibility of Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; Seul Ki Choi; Leepao Khang; Dayna A Campbell; Daniela B Friedman; Jan M Eberth; Russell E Glasgow; Reginald Tucker-Seeley; Sudha Xirasagar; Mei Po Yip; Vicki M Young; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-08

4.  Art therapy based on appreciation of famous paintings and its effect on distress among cancer patients.

Authors:  Jeongshim Lee; Mi Yeon Choi; Yong Bae Kim; Jiyu Sun; Eun Jung Park; Ju Hye Kim; Minchul Kang; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Interventions to enhance self-efficacy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thomas V Merluzzi; James E Pustejovsky; Errol J Philip; Stephanie J Sohl; Mark Berendsen; John M Salsman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of effects on positive affect.

Authors:  John M Salsman; James E Pustejovsky; Stephen M Schueller; Rosalba Hernandez; Mark Berendsen; Laurie E Steffen McLouth; Judith T Moskowitz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 7.  Effects of psychosocial interventions on meaning and purpose in adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Crystal L Park; James E Pustejovsky; Kelly Trevino; Allen C Sherman; Craig Esposito; Mark Berendsen; John M Salsman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Race by sex differences in depression symptoms and psychosocial service use among non-Hispanic black and white patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Lara Traeger; Sheila Cannon; Nancy L Keating; William F Pirl; Christopher Lathan; Michelle Y Martin; Yulei He; Elyse R Park
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Optimism and Spontaneous Self-affirmation are Associated with Lower Likelihood of Cognitive Impairment and Greater Positive Affect among Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Erin E Kent; Peter R Harris
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-04

10.  Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Anne Moyer; Sarah Knapp-Oliver; Stephanie Sohl; Dolores Cannella; Valerie Targhetta
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.