Literature DB >> 19826351

Lessons to be learned from 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.

Anne Moyer1, Sarah K Knapp-Oliver, Stephanie J Sohl, Stefan Schnieder, Anna H L Floyd.   

Abstract

Conducting rigorous psychosocial intervention research with cancer patients has many challenges including encouraging them to join studies, asking them to engage in interventions or be part of control conditions, and to provide data over follow-up assessments. Here, we highlight valuable insights regarding such challenges provided by investigators studying psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. Handling these skillfully has important implications for the internal and external validity of this research and the ethical treatment of participants. Challenges noted in research reports included in a systematic review of 25 years of research (comprising 488 unique projects) investigating interventions designed to enhance cancer patients' quality of life were compiled. Among the difficulties mentioned was the fact that patients may not feel the need for psychosocial interventions and thus may not be interested in joining an intervention study. Patients who do feel the need for such interventions may be deterred from joining trials by the prospect of being randomized to a nonpreferred group; if they do join a trial, participants may be disappointed, drop out, or seek compensatory additional assistance when they are assigned to a control group. Apart from randomization, other aspects of research may be off-putting to participants or potential participants, such as the language of consent forms or the intrusiveness of questions being asked. Potential remedies, such as research awareness interventions, monetary incentives, partnering with cancer support organizations, and using designs that take preferences into account merit consideration and further research inquiry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826351      PMCID: PMC3032403          DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181bf51fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  71 in total

1.  In a randomized controlled trial, missing data led to biased results regarding anxiety.

Authors:  Lone Ross; Birthe Lykke Thomsen; Ellen Helle Boesen; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies.

Authors:  J Mapstone; D Elbourne; I Roberts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

3.  Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  L M Ong; M R Visser; F B Lammes; J van Der Velden; B C Kuenen; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Lessons learned from enrollment in the BEST study--a multicenter, randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  P J Goodwin; M Leszcz; G Quirt; J Koopmans; A Arnold; E Dohan; M Hundleby; H M Chochinov; M Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  The role of choice in health education intervention trials: a review and case study.

Authors:  Mary R Janevic; Nancy K Janz; Julia A Dodge; Xihong Lin; Wenqin Pan; Brandy R Sinco; Noreen M Clark
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Exercise manages fatigue during breast cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Victoria Mock; Constantine Frangakis; Nancy E Davidson; Mary E Ropka; Mary Pickett; Barbara Poniatowski; Kerry J Stewart; Lane Cameron; Kristin Zawacki; Laura J Podewils; Gary Cohen; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Psychological intervention in cancer patients: a randomized study.

Authors:  L Baider; T Peretz; P E Hadani; U Koch
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  A presurgical psychosocial intervention for breast cancer patients. psychological distress and the immune response.

Authors:  M R Larson; P R Duberstein; N L Talbot; C Caldwell; J A Moynihan
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Educational support programme for gynaecological cancer patients and their families.

Authors:  M E Carlsson; P M Strang
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  A phase II trial of Reiki for the management of pain in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Karin Olson; John Hanson; Mary Michaud
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.612

View more
  12 in total

1.  Patient and caregiver perceptions of lymphoma care and research opportunities: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jackelyn B Payne; Kaylin V Dance; Monique Farone; Anh Phan; Cathy D Ho; Meghan Gutierrez; Lillian Chen; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Edward A Frongillo; Swann A Adams; Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Thomas G Hurley; Donald R Miller; Ira S Ockene
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Santería as Informal Mental Health Support Among U.S. Latinos with Cancer.

Authors:  Adelaida M Rosario; Mario DE LA Rosa
Journal:  J Relig Spiritual Soc Work       Date:  2014-02-24

4.  Design and rationale for NOURISH-T: a randomized control trial targeting parents of overweight children off cancer treatment.

Authors:  Marilyn Stern; Lin Ewing; Esther Davila; Amanda L Thompson; Gregory Hale; Suzanne Mazzeo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on psychosocial outcomes and quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Virginia P Henderson; Lynn Clemow; Ann O Massion; Thomas G Hurley; Susan Druker; James R Hébert
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A cluster-randomized control trial targeting parents of pediatric cancer survivors with obesity: Rationale and study protocol of NOURISH-T.

Authors:  Marilyn Stern; Heewon L Gray; Kathy Ruble; Sandra Soca Lozano; Alexandra Albizu-Jacob; Jeffrey M Williams; Kamar Godder; Bernard Fuemmeler; Suzanne Mazzeo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of psychosocial interventions on spiritual well-being in adults with cancer.

Authors:  Laurie E McLouth; C Graham Ford; James E Pustejovsky; Crystal L Park; Allen C Sherman; Kelly Trevino; John M Salsman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Psychosocial consequences of allocation to lung cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Louise Mosborg Aggestrup; Mie Sara Hestbech; Volkert Siersma; Jesper Holst Pedersen; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Effectiveness of psychoeducational support on quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ayako Matsuda; Kazue Yamaoka; Toshiro Tango; Tomohiro Matsuda; Hiroshi Nishimoto
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Examining Mediators and Moderators of Yoga for Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chelsea G Ratcliff; Kathrin Milbury; Kavita D Chandwani; Alejandro Chaoul; George Perkins; Raghuram Nagarathna; Robin Haddad; Hongasandra Ramarao Nagendra; N V Raghuram; Amy Spelman; Banu Arun; Qi Wei; Lorenzo Cohen
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.